Skip to content
CharityCompare

Compare charities side-by-side

Pick up to four and see their Clarity scores, cause spend, reserves and filing record in one table — straight from UK regulator accounts.

How we score Information only — not donation advice.

0 of 4 selected

Loading charities…

Pick two charities to compare

Search above, or start from one of these — you can swap any of them out afterwards.

Information only — not donation advice. Methodology · Charity Commission annual returns for England & Wales.

Popular head-to-head comparisons

Brand and model match-ups with Clarity Score beacons and UK regulator filings — information only, not donation advice.

Compare

Macmillan Cancer Support vs Cancer Research UK

Macmillan focuses on support for people living with cancer; Cancer Research UK funds research into prevention, diagnosis and treatment — compare filings and Clarity Scores, then fund the model you want.

Open comparison →

Compare

RSPCA vs Battersea Dogs & Cats Home

The RSPCA combines national animal welfare with inspectorate and prosecution work; Battersea focuses on rescue and rehoming — different jobs, both checkable on filings.

Open comparison →

Compare

Dogs Trust vs Battersea Dogs & Cats Home

Dogs Trust and Battersea are both major rehoming organisations — closer like-for-like than RSPCA vs Battersea — so filings and Clarity Score beacons matter more than brand preference alone.

Open comparison →

Compare

Shelter vs Crisis

Shelter and Crisis are both major homelessness organisations with strong public profiles — compare what each emphasises, then check Clarity Scores and cause spend before you donate.

Open comparison →

Compare

Large national animal charity vs Local animal rescue

National charities offer scale and brand recognition; local rescues often spend a higher share directly on animals in your area.

Open comparison →

Compare

Cancer research charity vs Patient support charity

Research charities invest in long-term cures; patient support charities help people facing cancer today — many donors choose both.

Open comparison →

Compare

National homelessness charity vs Local homelessness service

National bodies influence housing policy; local services often provide direct beds and outreach in your city.

Open comparison →

Compare

Large international aid agency vs Specialist niche charity

Large agencies deploy fast in crises; specialists may excel in one intervention with lower overhead debate.

Open comparison →

Compare

Oxfam GB vs Save the Children UK

Oxfam focuses on global poverty, water and emergency relief; Save the Children prioritises child health, protection and education — compare filings and Clarity Scores.

Open comparison →

Compare

NSPCC vs Barnardo's

The NSPCC is built around child protection, investigation and a national helpline; Barnardo's delivers children's services and family support at scale — complementary models, not interchangeable brands.

Open comparison →

Compare

British Heart Foundation vs Stroke Association

The British Heart Foundation focuses on heart and circulatory disease; the Stroke Association on stroke prevention, treatment and life after stroke — related conditions, different jobs for a donation.

Open comparison →

Compare

Mind vs Samaritans

Mind combines services, local networks and campaigning on mental health; Samaritans is built around a 24-hour listening service — different jobs, both checkable on filings.

Open comparison →

Compare

Cats Protection vs Battersea Dogs & Cats Home

Cats Protection is a national cats-only welfare and rehoming charity; Battersea rescues and rehomes dogs and cats — closer like-for-like than RSPCA vs Battersea, but still a species-mix choice.

Open comparison →

Compare

Islamic Relief Worldwide vs Muslim Aid

Islamic Relief Worldwide and Muslim Aid are both UK-registered humanitarian charities working overseas — closer like-for-like than a faith charity vs a secular agency, so filings and Clarity Score beacons matter more than brand preference alone.

Open comparison →

Compare

Help for Heroes vs The Royal British Legion

Help for Heroes is built around recovery and support for wounded, injured and sick personnel and veterans; the Royal British Legion is a broader ex-service welfare and membership organisation — different jobs, both checkable on filings.

Open comparison →

Compare

Marie Curie vs Macmillan Cancer Support

Marie Curie is built around hospice and end-of-life care; Macmillan around support for people living with cancer — related, not interchangeable, and both checkable on filings.

Open comparison →

Compare

Alzheimer's Society vs Alzheimer's Research UK

Alzheimer's Society is built around support, information and services for people living with dementia; Alzheimer's Research UK funds research — complementary models, not interchangeable brands.

Open comparison →

Compare

Guide Dogs vs RNIB

Guide Dogs is built around assistance dogs and related mobility; RNIB is a broader sight-loss organisation covering information, services and campaigning — different jobs, both checkable on filings.

Open comparison →

Compare

PDSA vs Blue Cross

PDSA is built around veterinary treatment for sick and injured animals; Blue Cross around rehoming and welfare — closer to a model choice than RSPCA vs Battersea, and both checkable on filings.

Open comparison →

Compare

WWF-UK vs RSPB

WWF-UK is a UK-registered arm of a global conservation network; the RSPB is built around birds and habitats in the UK — related “environment” labels, different jobs for a donation.

Open comparison →

Compare

Christian Aid vs CAFOD

Christian Aid and CAFOD are both UK-registered Christian humanitarian and development charities — closer like-for-like than a faith charity vs a secular agency, so filings and Clarity Score beacons matter more than brand preference alone.

Open comparison →

Guides: How to compare charities · Cancer charities · Animal charities

Clarity Score

How we score

The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK regulator filings (Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR and CCNI). Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.

Read full methodology →

90+Exceptional
75+Good
60+Needs improvement
1+Poor
0+Not rated
Beacon

Accountability & Transparency

40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).

Beacon

Financial Health

30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).

Beacon

Financial Efficiency

20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).

Beacon

Community Support

10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.

Overall score (0–100)

Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.

Overall score (0–100)

Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.

Pillar breakdown

Each sub-metric awards fixed points (e.g. 15/15, 10/10). Pillar rings show the percentage of that pillar’s maximum earned.

Red flags

Factual cards — statutory inquiry, fewer than three trustees, late filings, high fundraising spend, sharp income drops, very high reserves.

Give with Confidence

Score 75+ (about 4★ on the 5-star display), no serious red flags, filings up to date, no statutory inquiry.

What we exclude from a full score

A full Clarity Score needs detailed annual-return fields. Charities under £100,000 income, and many OSCR/CCNI records with thinner published returns, get a basic register profile instead of a score. Optional donor support never influences ratings. Every UK-registered charity still has a profile.

Information only — not donation advice. Source: UK charity regulator registers and annual returns (Charity Commission for England & Wales, OSCR, CCNI). Changelog →

Common questions

Is comparing Clarity Scores donation advice?

No. Clarity Scores summarise official UK regulator filings. A higher score does not mean you should donate there. Read the full profile, the scoring guide below, and the charity’s own accounts before giving.

How many charities can I compare at once?

Up to four from our directory — Clarity scores (0–100), beacon breakdowns, income, cause-spend percentages and filing status appear side-by-side.

Where does the data come from?

UK regulator annual returns and registers — the Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR in Scotland, and CCNI in Northern Ireland. Every profile cites primary sources. Rated profiles need detailed return fields; thinner records get a basic register page.

Can I compare famous charities like Macmillan vs Cancer Research UK?

Yes. Use the interactive tool above, or open a curated head-to-head — Macmillan vs Cancer Research UK, Marie Curie vs Macmillan, NSPCC vs Barnardo’s, Mind vs Samaritans, RSPCA vs Battersea, Help for Heroes vs the Royal British Legion, and others — which explain model differences plus filings snapshots.

How do I compare charities in my city?

Browse by cause and city for pages such as best animal charities in Bristol or homeless charities in Manchester, then open the compare tool with up to four shortlisted charities.