Skip to content
CharityCompare
BRITISH HEART FOUNDATION

82/100 4★

Reg. 225971

compared with
STROKE ASSOCIATION

86/100 4★

Reg. 211015

British Heart Foundation vs Stroke Association — charity comparison

In short: The British Heart Foundation focuses on heart and circulatory disease; the Stroke Association on stroke prevention, treatment and life after stroke — related conditions, different jobs for a donation.

Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .

Heart and stroke sit in the same circulatory-health neighbourhood, which is why donors compare these two brands. They are not substitutes. Shop-heavy and research-heavy models also look different on cause spend — read the filings snapshot rather than an overhead slogan. Information only.

Key differences

What to compare BRITISH HEART FOUNDATION STROKE ASSOCIATION
Primary model Heart and circulatory disease — research, information and support Stroke — prevention, support and recovery
Condition focus Heart and circulatory disease in the round Stroke specifically
What “cause spend” can look like Research plus a large retail network can change the ratio — read the year Support and prevention programmes — still compare peers, not slogans
Best if you want A major heart-disease research and support charity A major stroke charity

What the latest filings show

Figures from the most recent annual accounts on the Charity Commission register. Clarity scores use our methodology.

Metric BRITISH HEART FOUNDATION STROKE ASSOCIATION
Overall score 82/100 (4★) 86/100 (4★)
Accountability & Finance 100/100 100/100
Spend on charitable activities 36% of expenditure 79% of expenditure
Fundraising efficiency £10.1 raised per £1 fundraising (3-yr avg) £4.9 raised per £1 fundraising (3-yr avg)
Latest income £411m £44m
Fundraising spend 10% of expenditure 21% of expenditure
Reserves 3 months 10 months
Accounts filing On time On time
Data confidence high high
Charity number 225971 211015

BRITISH HEART FOUNDATION on the register · STROKE ASSOCIATION on the register

BRITISH HEART FOUNDATION may suit you if…

  • You want to fund heart and circulatory disease research or support
  • You already use or recognise BHF information or shops
  • You are choosing a national heart charity after reading the filings
Full profile →

STROKE ASSOCIATION may suit you if…

  • You want donations aimed at stroke prevention and life after stroke
  • You or someone you know has been affected by stroke
  • You want a stroke-specific national charity rather than a general heart fund
Full profile →

Common questions

British Heart Foundation vs Stroke Association — which should I donate to?

Neither is universally better. They fund different conditions. Compare Clarity Scores and cause spend, then give to the condition and model you intend — many donors support both over time.

Why might cause spend look low on a shop-heavy health charity?

Retail and trading can sit outside “charitable activities” in the accounts even when shops fund the mission. That is a reason to read the snapshot and trustees’ report, not to treat the lowest ratio as the winner.

How we score charities +

The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK regulator filings (Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR and CCNI). Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.

Full methodology →

Accountability & Transparency

Scored from filings

40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).

Financial Health

Scored from filings

30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).

Financial Efficiency

Scored from filings

20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).

Community Support

Scored from filings

10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.

Overall score

Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.