Skip to content
CharityCompare
MARIE CURIE

80/100 4★

Reg. 207994

compared with
MACMILLAN CANCER SUPPORT

75/100 4★

Reg. 261017

Marie Curie vs Macmillan — charity comparison

In short: Marie Curie is built around hospice and end-of-life care; Macmillan around support for people living with cancer — related, not interchangeable, and both checkable on filings.

Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .

Marie Curie vs Macmillan is the usual search when someone wants to help people with cancer and knows both names. One is a hospice and nursing charity (not only cancer). The other is a cancer-support organisation. For research vs support, see Macmillan vs Cancer Research UK instead. Information only.

Key differences

What to compare MARIE CURIE MACMILLAN CANCER SUPPORT
Primary model Hospice, palliative and end-of-life nursing and support Information, support services, grants and advocacy for people with cancer
Condition focus Terminal illness and end of life (including, but not only, cancer) Cancer — living with and beyond a diagnosis
Results timeline Care for people at the end of life, and their families, now Practical and emotional support during and after cancer
Best if you want Hospice and end-of-life care Support for people living with cancer

What the latest filings show

Figures from the most recent annual accounts on the Charity Commission register. Clarity scores use our methodology.

Metric MARIE CURIE MACMILLAN CANCER SUPPORT
Overall score 80/100 (4★) 75/100 (4★)
Accountability & Finance 100/100 100/100
Spend on charitable activities 71% of expenditure 69% of expenditure
Fundraising efficiency £3.2 raised per £1 fundraising (3-yr avg) £3.1 raised per £1 fundraising (3-yr avg)
Latest income £181m £246m
Fundraising spend 29% of expenditure 31% of expenditure
Reserves 5 months 2 months
Accounts filing On time On time
Data confidence high high
Charity number 207994 261017

MARIE CURIE on the register · MACMILLAN CANCER SUPPORT on the register

MARIE CURIE may suit you if…

  • You want donations to fund hospice and end-of-life nursing
  • You or someone you know has used Marie Curie services
  • You are choosing a national palliative-care charity after reading the filings
Full profile →

MACMILLAN CANCER SUPPORT may suit you if…

  • You want support for people living with cancer today
  • You or someone you know has used Macmillan-style services
  • You prefer cancer-support over hospice as the primary model
Full profile →

Common questions

Marie Curie vs Macmillan — which is better to donate to?

Neither is universally better. Marie Curie is oriented to hospice and end-of-life care; Macmillan to cancer support. Compare Clarity Scores and cause spend, then give to the model that matches your intention.

What about Cancer Research UK?

That is a research-led model, not a support or hospice charity. See Macmillan vs Cancer Research UK if you are choosing between support and research.

How we score charities +

The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK regulator filings (Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR and CCNI). Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.

Full methodology →

Accountability & Transparency

Scored from filings

40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).

Financial Health

Scored from filings

30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).

Financial Efficiency

Scored from filings

20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).

Community Support

Scored from filings

10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.

Overall score

Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.