Skip to content
CharityCompare
CENTREPOINT SOHO

76/100 4★

Reg. 292411

compared with

National vs local homelessness charity — compared

In short: National bodies influence housing policy; local services often provide direct beds and outreach in your city.

Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .

Homelessness charities range from household names running helplines and campaigns to city-based organisations running hostels.

Key differences

What to compare CENTREPOINT SOHO ST MUNGO COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION
Services Helplines, research, campaigning Hostels, outreach, local advice
Scale Millions in income Often under £10m
Measure of success Policy wins, advice reach Bed nights, people housed

What the latest filings show

Figures from the most recent annual accounts on the Charity Commission register. Clarity scores use our methodology.

Metric CENTREPOINT SOHO ST MUNGO COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION
Overall score 76/100 (4★) 77/100 (4★)
Accountability & Finance 100/100 100/100
Spend on charitable activities 71% of expenditure 96% of expenditure
Fundraising efficiency £3.8 raised per £1 fundraising (3-yr avg) £24.7 raised per £1 fundraising (3-yr avg)
Latest income £63m £124m
Fundraising spend 29% of expenditure 4% of expenditure
Reserves 2 months 2 months
Accounts filing On time On time
Data confidence high high
Charity number 292411 1149085

CENTREPOINT SOHO on the register · ST MUNGO COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION on the register

CENTREPOINT SOHO may suit you if…

  • You want systemic change
  • You use national helplines
Full profile →

ST MUNGO COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION may suit you if…

  • You want local beds and meals
  • You walk past their centre daily
Full profile →

Common questions

Should I donate to a national homelessness charity or a local one?

It depends whether you want policy and advice at scale or beds and outreach in one city. Compare Clarity Scores and cause spend, then give to the model you want to fund.

How we score charities +

The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK regulator filings (Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR and CCNI). Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.

Full methodology →

Accountability & Transparency

Scored from filings

40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).

Financial Health

Scored from filings

30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).

Financial Efficiency

Scored from filings

20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).

Community Support

Scored from filings

10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.

Overall score

Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.