Cats Protection vs Battersea — charity comparison
In short: Cats Protection: Cat rehoming, neutering and welfare information. Battersea Dogs & Cats Home: Care, reunification and rehoming for dogs and cats. Match the work to your purpose, then compare dated accounts and evidence.
Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .
This comparison brings together registered purposes, source-checked interpretation and the accounts held by CharityCompare. The organisations may use different reporting periods and definitions. Read the source notes before comparing totals or treating a financial score as an assessment of programme results.
Key differences
| What to compare | CATS PROTECTION | BATTERSEA DOGS' AND CATS' HOME |
|---|---|---|
| Registered work and operating model | Cat rehoming, neutering and welfare information. | Care, reunification and rehoming for dogs and cats. |
| What to consider | Different parts of its work address different needs: finding homes, preventing unwanted litters and helping owners. Do not add these totals as though they were unique animals unless the reporting method explains overlap. | Its registered activities combine care, reuniting animals with owners and finding new homes. Rehoming totals need context on species, intake, veterinary needs and follow-up; a larger total alone does not establish better welfare. |
| Access and practical checks | Use the official local service finder to ask about rehoming, neutering assistance or advice. Eligibility and capacity should be checked for the particular service. | Check Battersea’s current rehoming or animal-intake process before travelling. Matching criteria and capacity depend on the animal and service. |
| Sourced result or evidence gap | No programme outcome has been source-checked for this profile. This is a gap in our coverage, not evidence of no impact. | No programme outcome has been source-checked for this profile. This is a gap in our coverage, not evidence of no impact. |
What the latest filings show
Figures from the accounts held in our dated dataset; the live register may contain newer filings. Ratios can span multiple years, as labelled. Clarity scores use our methodology.
These snapshots have different latest accounts years. Compare the same period in the full profiles before drawing a conclusion from a financial difference.
| Metric | CATS PROTECTION | BATTERSEA DOGS' AND CATS' HOME |
|---|---|---|
| Latest accounts year in our snapshot | 2025 | 2024 |
| Financial snapshot refreshed | 2026-09-06 | 2026-09-06 |
| Ratio reporting window | 3-yr avg | 3-yr avg |
| Overall score | 76/100 (4★) | 89/100 (4★) |
| Accountability & Finance | 75/100 | 100/100 |
| Spend on charitable activities | 68% of expenditure | 68% of expenditure |
| Fundraising efficiency | £3.0 total income per £1 fundraising (2023–2025, disclosed years) | £4.3 total income per £1 fundraising (2022–2024, disclosed years) |
| Latest income | £106m | £70m |
| Fundraising spend | 32% of expenditure | 26% of expenditure |
| Reserves | 6 months | 11 months |
| Accounts filing | On time | On time |
| Data confidence | high | high |
| Charity number | 203644 | 206394 |
CATS PROTECTION on the register · BATTERSEA DOGS' AND CATS' HOME on the register
Considering Cats Protection
- Cat rehoming, neutering and welfare information.
- Use the official local service finder to ask about rehoming, neutering assistance or advice. Eligibility and capacity should be checked for the particular service.
Considering Battersea Dogs & Cats Home
- Care, reunification and rehoming for dogs and cats.
- Check Battersea’s current rehoming or animal-intake process before travelling. Matching criteria and capacity depend on the animal and service.
Common questions
Cats Protection or Battersea Dogs & Cats Home: which should I support?
There is no universal winner. Cat rehoming, neutering and welfare information. Care, reunification and rehoming for dogs and cats. Check the programme that interests you, the accounts period and the evidence behind any result. A financial rating is not an impact assessment.
Can I compare the headline results directly?
Only if the definitions, population, geography and reporting periods match. Research expenditure, service contacts and lasting outcomes measure different things. The source notes explain any figures included here.
How we score charities +
The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK regulator filings (Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR and CCNI). Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.
Accountability & Transparency
Scored from filings
40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).
Financial Health
Scored from filings
30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).
Financial Efficiency
Scored from filings
20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).
Community Support
Scored from filings
10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.
Overall score
Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.