Disability · Reg 800435
Clarity score
Poor
Charity accounts, evidence & financial rating
27/100 Clarity Score · 2 stars · Charity Commission filings · How we score
Register checked 4 October 2026 · latest accounts 2025
Work at The Douglas Bader Foundation? Claim this profile free to add your charity’s description. Claiming never changes the score.
Quick answer
The Douglas Bader Foundation scores 27/100 (2 stars, Poor) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, calculated from its UK regulator filings. Its latest accounts year is 2025 (£563 total income, cause-spend split not disclosed). This reflects financial transparency and stewardship on paper — not the real-world impact of its programmes. See the full breakdown.
Income
£563
Accounts 2025-10-31
Spending
£16k
Accounts 2025-10-31
Charitable activities
Not disclosed
No separate spending figure
Accounts filing
Late
Check register
The Foundation is established to advance & promote the physical, mental & spiritual welfare and benefit of persons who are without one or more limbs or otherwise physically disabled. This is delivered through Bader Braves Events, the inclusive information site for amputees www.limblossinformationcentre.com, The Bader Grant Scheme, Amputee games support and all inclusive "Bader Challenge" events.
Activities reported by the charity on the official register · extract . This is separate from the accounts data used for its rating.
The Douglas Bader Foundation hasn't added a description directly to CharityCompare yet. Work here? Add it free →
Accounts period 2024-11-01 to 2025-10-31 · Source: Charity Commission filings
| Category | Amount | % of spend |
|---|---|---|
| Total income | £563 | — |
| Total expenditure | £16k | — |
| Charitable activities | Not disclosed | — |
Reported totals for 2025 compared with 2024. Changes can reflect the accounting period, restricted grants or restructuring as well as the charity’s work.
Reported income changes from £396k to £563. We do not show a growth percentage across this large discontinuity: check whether the two accounts cover comparable activities and periods. Read the evidence and context.
These are annual figures. The Clarity Score may use averages across several disclosed years. Source: official accounts.
Latest accounts (2025) · £16k spent. Not disclosed in this filing — the Charity Commission return omits the charitable-activities split.
From the annual return
Answers The Douglas Bader Foundation gave in its annual return to the Charity Commission, plus its register entry. These are the charity's own disclosures, not part of the Clarity Score.
The register records The Douglas Bader Foundation as registered with HMRC for Gift Aid, so a UK taxpayer can usually add 25p to every £1 they give by making a Gift Aid declaration. Work out your Gift Aid
Source: Charity Commission register and annual return data, Open Government Licence v3.0. A blank answer in the return is shown as not reported, never as “no”.
Income fell 100% from £803k in 2021 to £563 in 2025; spending was £16k in 2025.
| Year | Income | Spending | Charitable activities |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | £563 | £16k | Not disclosed |
| 2024 | £396k | £632k | Not disclosed |
| 2023 | £377k | £461k | Not disclosed |
| 2022 | £354k | £627k | Not disclosed |
| 2021 | £803k | £759k | £587k |
Cause spend is plotted only when the filing discloses a split · Source: Charity Commission filings
The share of each group scoring at or below The Douglas Bader Foundation, including tied scores. A group matched on cause, income band and accounts year appears when at least ten records qualify. Broader groups below may mix reporting periods and operating models. Groups include this charity; percentiles measure our financial rating, not impact.
Scores at or above 5% of 83 charities with the same primary cause, income band and latest accounts year · 27/100 vs 52 peer average.
Scores at or above 3% of 1,002 charities in its income band · 27/100 vs 52 peer average.
Scores at or above 1% of 702 charities in this cause · 27/100 vs 76 peer average.
The causes this charity is classified under, and other charities working nearby.
Top-rated peers by CharityCompare score
Evidence and interpretation
In 2025, reported income was £563 and expenditure was £16,327. Expenditure exceeded income by £15,764. This annual balance is not the charity’s available cash or unrestricted reserves.
Reported income changes sharply between 2024 and 2025. A numerical jump alone does not establish growth, decline or a restructuring. Read both sets of accounts to establish whether their periods and reporting boundaries are comparable.
A separate charitable-activities spending figure is not available for this year in our dataset. We cannot calculate an annual programme-spending share from these fields.
Calculated from our dated accounts dataset, refreshed 2026-09-06. This is not an audit or a manual review of every filing. Original register and accounts · How calculations work.
Find the right support
Reported beneficiaries: People With Disabilities.
How it works: Makes Grants To Individuals; Provides Advocacy/advice/information; Other Charitable Activities.
Use the official contact details to check eligibility, referrals, waiting lists and current service coverage. Broad register classifications and a contact address do not confirm that a particular service is available to you.
Explore source-checked support routesClassifications supplied to the register; extract 2026-10-04. Register contact and activity details · Website listed for this charity
Look beyond the score
We have not added a source-checked programme outcome for this charity. That is a gap in this profile, not evidence that the charity has no impact. Its annual report may contain results that have not been assessed here.
Reported grants to institutions: £425,966 (2021-10-31). This is spending reported in the annual return, not a measure of beneficiary outcomes or an open grant opportunity. It may already be included in charitable expenditure. Check the source accounts.
Counts of services delivered describe activity. They do not by themselves establish lasting change, what would have happened without the programme, or cost-effectiveness. Results with different definitions, populations or years should not be ranked against each other.
Detailed accountability and finance metrics from UK regulator filings — structured for transparency in our four-beacon report.
Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.
68/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Filing history (5 years) No recorded lateness in available history = 15 pts · one late filing = 5 pts · two or more or unknown status = 0 pts. Missing data is not proof of late filing. | 33% | 5/15 pts |
| Trustee oversight Three or more trustees on the register = 15 pts, scaled down for fewer (governance red flag below three). | 100% | 4 trustees · 15/15 pts |
| Declared policies Safeguarding (4) · conflict of interest (3) · volunteer management (3) — from Charity Commission annual return. | 70% | 7/10 pts |
Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.
0/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Reserves (months of expenditure) 3–24 months = full marks, tapering on both sides · 0 months or 4+ years = 0 pts. Reserves are not necessarily cash; needs vary by operating model. | 0% | Not stated · 0/15 pts |
| Income stability / growth +20% or more over the window = 10 pts · flat = 5 pts · −20% or worse = 0 pts, scaled between. | 0% | Comparability review needed · 0/10 pts |
| Liabilities to assets 0% liabilities-to-assets = 5 pts, scaling down to 0 pts at 60%+ debt. | 0% | Not stated · 0/5 pts |
How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.
0/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Program expense ratio 90%+ on charitable activities = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 50% or below. | 0% | Not stated · 0/10 pts |
| Fundraising efficiency ≤10p to raise £1 = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 40p or above (fundraising cost ÷ income). | 0% | Not stated · 0/10 pts |
Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.
0/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Volunteer-to-staff ratio Volunteers at 2x staff or more = full marks · no volunteers = 0 pts, scaled between. | 0% | Not reported · 0/10 pts |
Pulled from the Charity Commission register — filing behaviour, board size, and workforce where reported.
Accounts filed on time
Filing status: late
Trustee board size (3–12)
4 trustees on the Charity Commission register
Fundraising Regulator
Status not yet checked
Separate from our financial scores. Registration records a commitment to the Code of Fundraising Practice; it does not certify every fundraising activity.
Check Fundraising Regulator →Official register
Reg 800435
Full trustee list, accounts, and regulatory history on the Charity Commission.
View on Charity Commission →Medium confidence — some data missing or late
Scores reflect the accounts in our dated data extract. The live register may contain newer filings. Clarity Score measures how clearly the charity accounts for money in those filings — not programme impact.
Check the current register entry · Report a data correction
Financial source extract: 2026-09-06. Organisation identifier: 800435. Method version: 1.1. View method changes.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Sources: Charity Commission for England and Wales, Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator and Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. Open Government Licence v3.0 .
Your donation decision
Check 800435 on the official register. A real charity number alone does not prove that a fundraiser or appeal is authentic.
Verify the registration →Our latest accounts data covers 2025. Compare the accounts period, spending and reserves. An administration cost ratio alone cannot tell you how effective a charity is.
Explore the financial evidence →Read the trustees’ annual report for activities, outcomes and limitations. The Clarity Score measures public reporting; it does not establish the impact of a donation.
How to read charity accounts →Compare up to four charities, check the dates behind their figures, and decide which work you want to support. Complete your donation through a verified charity channel.
Start a comparison with The Douglas Bader Foundation →The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK regulator filings (Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR and CCNI). Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.
Accountability & Transparency
Scored from filings
40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).
Financial Health
Scored from filings
30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).
Financial Efficiency
Scored from filings
20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).
Community Support
Scored from filings
10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.
Overall score
Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.
Opens a printer-friendly view of this profile for The Douglas Bader Foundation.
For this charity
Free to use — a lightweight HTML badge or an embeddable score widget, each linking back to this independent profile and our methodology.
Common questions about The Douglas Bader Foundation's rating, finances, and Charity Commission status.
The Douglas Bader Foundation scores 27 out of 100 (2 stars — Poor) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, our independent read of its UK regulator filings. Its recent filings do not disclose a charitable-activities spend split and its accounts are late. That reflects how transparent and financially healthy it looks on paper — it does not measure the real-world impact of its work, so treat it as one factor alongside the cause you care about. CharityCompare never tells you where to donate.
The register data used for this profile lists The Douglas Bader Foundation as a registered charity (charity number 800435). Verify it on the official register: https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-details/?regId=800435&subId=0. Check the current entry and the identity of anyone requesting money. Registration does not verify a particular appeal; Clarity Score summarises filing transparency, not programme impact.
The Douglas Bader Foundation's charity number is 800435. Check that number on the official register (Charity Commission, OSCR or CCNI) or this CharityCompare profile before you donate — scammers sometimes reuse real numbers on fake appeals.
The Douglas Bader Foundation scores 27 out of 100 on CharityCompare (2 stars — Poor). The Clarity Score (method v1.1) sums four pillars from UK regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 pts), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10). Stars use the same bands as those labels — 90+ is 5★ Exceptional. It is not an impact ranking.
CharityCompare does not host public user reviews for The Douglas Bader Foundation. Instead you get a filing-based Clarity Score, cause spend, reserves and red flags such as late accounts (2 red flags on this profile: late accounts filing; sharp income decline). For formal complaints about a charity, contact the Charity Commission, OSCR, CCNI or the Fundraising Regulator as appropriate.
The Douglas Bader Foundation does not disclose a charitable-activities spend split in its recent UK regulator filings, so there is no official figure for how much of a donation reaches the cause. CharityCompare reports this as "not disclosed" rather than assuming a number.
The Douglas Bader Foundation's recent UK regulator filings do not disclose a fundraising or governance cost split, so no official overhead percentage is available. The register does not show individual salaries; senior pay is disclosed in the trustees' annual report and accounts.
The Douglas Bader Foundation reported £563 total income in its 2025 accounts, based on UK regulator filings. Five-year trend: check comparability.
Filing status: late (last filing 2026-07-31). CharityCompare flags late or missing accounts separately from the financial score.
The Douglas Bader Foundation's registered contact address is in Hemel Hempstead (HP23 5TE). It tells the regulator it operates in England and Wales, with a focus on disability.
The register records The Douglas Bader Foundation as registered with HMRC for Gift Aid, so a UK taxpayer can usually add 25p to every £1 they give by making a Gift Aid declaration.
The Douglas Bader Foundation was entered on the register on 16 November 1988. It is also a company registered at Companies House (company number 02288815).
We calculate a Clarity Score of 0–100 from four pillars in The Douglas Bader Foundation's regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 points — filing history, trustees, policies), Financial Health (30 — reserves, income trend, debt), Financial Efficiency (20 — cause spend and fundraising cost, on a graduated scale) and Community Support (10 — volunteer-to-staff ratio). An open statutory inquiry scores 0. The score measures reporting on paper, not programme impact. CharityCompare is free for donors, takes no commission on donations, and scores cannot be bought.
This profile was last updated on 6 September 2026 from the latest UK regulator data available to CharityCompare, and The Douglas Bader Foundation's most recent accounts cover 2025. Scores and figures refresh whenever we re-ingest the register, so the page reflects our latest data pull rather than a one-off review.