Skip to content
CharityCompare

Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation

Charity rating & review

74/100 Clarity Score · 3 stars · Charity Commission filings · How we score

Verified · Charity Commission data
74 /100

Clarity score

Needs improvement

Donate

Quick answer

Is Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation a good charity?

Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation scores 74/100 (3 stars, Needs improvement) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, calculated from its UK regulator filings. Its latest accounts year is 2024 (£1.1m total income, cause-spend split not disclosed). This reflects financial transparency and stewardship on paper — not the real-world impact of its programmes. See the full breakdown.

Bristol · BS7 9EJ Reg 1196719 Registered charity Official website Charity Commission register

What does Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation do?

Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation is a registered charity (no. 1196719) working in disability in Bristol · BS7 9EJ. Its latest Charity Commission filing does not disclose a charitable-activities spend split in recent filings, holding roughly 5 months of reserves, though its recent accounts were filed late. Reported income has been growing (≈6% a year). CharityCompare's Clarity Score rates the organisation only from public Charity Commission accounts — accountability, financial health, efficiency and community support — not the quality or impact of its programmes.

Summarised from public filings — Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation hasn't added its own description yet. Work here? Add it free →

In short: GLOUCESTERSHIRE CRICKET FOUNDATION scores 74 out of 100 (3 stars). Cause-spend split not disclosed in recent filings. Review the pillar breakdown below.

What is Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation?

Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation has a Clarity Score of 74 out of 100 on CharityCompare (3 stars, Needs improvement). Charity Commission registration number 1196719. Status: Registered. Primary cause area: Disability. Latest accounts year 2024: total income £1.1m, cause-spend split not disclosed in that filing. Accounts filing: late. Reserves: approximately 5 months of operating costs. 1 filing concern(s) noted on this profile. Scores are independent and based on official filings — not a donation recommendation.

Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .

Overall score

74/100

3★ · Needs improvement

Cause spend

N/D

Not disclosed in filings

Accountability

68/100

Finance beacon

Income

£1.1m

Latest year 2024

Reserves

5 mo

Months of running costs

Accounts filing

Late

Check register

Fundraising efficiency not stated · Overhead not disclosed · Website on register · Confidence: medium

How does GLOUCESTERSHIRE CRICKET FOUNDATION compare?

Clarity Score percentile against similar UK charities — the share of peers GLOUCESTERSHIRE CRICKET FOUNDATION scores higher than.

Income band (£1m–£5m)35thpercentile

Scores higher than 35% of 2,776 charities in its income band · 74/100 vs 78 peer average (marker).

Disability charities33rdpercentile

Scores higher than 33% of 711 charities in this cause · 74/100 vs 79 peer average (marker).

How reliable is Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's data?

Source
Charity Commission (England & Wales)
Accounts year
2024
Filing date
Profile reviewed

Medium confidence — some data missing or late

Scores reflect the latest annual accounts on the register. Clarity Score measures how clearly the charity accounts for money in those filings — not programme impact.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Sources: Charity Commission for England and Wales, Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator and Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. Open Government Licence v3.0 .

What is Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's Beacon report?

Detailed accountability and finance metrics from UK regulator filings — structured for transparency in our four-beacon report.

Accountability & Transparency

Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.

68/100

Accountability & Transparency metrics for GLOUCESTERSHIRE CRICKET FOUNDATION
Metric Score Value
Filing history (5 years)

100% on-time over five years = 15 pts · one late filing = 5 pts · two or more = 0 pts.

33% 5/15 pts
Trustee oversight

Three or more trustees on the register = 15 pts, scaled down for fewer (governance red flag below three).

100% 10 trustees · 15/15 pts
Declared policies

Safeguarding (4) · conflict of interest (3) · volunteer management (3) — from Charity Commission annual return.

70% 7/10 pts

Financial Health

Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.

90/100

Financial Health metrics for GLOUCESTERSHIRE CRICKET FOUNDATION
Metric Score Value
Reserves (months of cash)

3–24 months = full marks, tapering on both sides · 0 months or 4+ years (hoarding) = 0 pts.

100% 5 months · 15/15 pts
Income stability / growth

+20% or more over the window = 10 pts · flat = 5 pts · −20% or worse = 0 pts, scaled between.

80% 8/10 pts · 3-year average
Liabilities to assets

0% liabilities-to-assets = 5 pts, scaling down to 0 pts at 60%+ debt.

80% 16% · 4/5 pts

Financial Efficiency

How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.

50/100

Financial Efficiency metrics for GLOUCESTERSHIRE CRICKET FOUNDATION
Metric Score Value
Program expense ratio

90%+ on charitable activities = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 50% or below.

0% Not stated · 0/10 pts
Fundraising efficiency

≤10p to raise £1 = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 40p or above (fundraising cost ÷ income).

100% 0p per £1 income · 10/10 pts (3-year average)

Community Support

Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.

100/100

Community Support metrics for GLOUCESTERSHIRE CRICKET FOUNDATION
Metric Score Value
Volunteer-to-staff ratio

Volunteers at 2x staff or more = full marks · no volunteers = 0 pts, scaled between.

100% 35 volunteers / 15 staff · 10/10 pts

How we calculate beacon scores →

What is Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's Clarity Score?

74/100 total · Needs improvement · 3 of 5 stars

Four pillars (40 + 30 + 20 + 10 points) from Charity Commission filings — see methodology for full weightings.

68/100
Accountability & Transparency
90/100
Financial Health
50/100
Financial Efficiency
100/100
Community Support

Accountability & Transparency

Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.

68/100

Filing history (5 years)5/15 pts
Trustee oversight10 trustees · 15/15 pts
Declared policies7/10 pts

Financial Health

Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.

90/100

Reserves (months of cash)5 months · 15/15 pts
Income stability / growth8/10 pts · 3-year average
Liabilities to assets16% · 4/5 pts

Financial Efficiency

How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.

50/100

Program expense ratioNot stated · 0/10 pts
Fundraising efficiency0p per £1 income · 10/10 pts (3-year average)

Community Support

Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.

100/100

Volunteer-to-staff ratio35 volunteers / 15 staff · 10/10 pts

How much does Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation raise and spend?

Latest filed year 2024 · Source: Charity Commission filings

GLOUCESTERSHIRE CRICKET FOUNDATION revenue and expenses for 2024
Category Amount % of spend
Total income £1.1m
Total expenditure £1.1m
Charitable activities Not disclosed

Where does the money go?

Latest accounts (2024) · £1.1m spent. Not disclosed in this filing — the Charity Commission return omits the charitable-activities split.

What trust indicators does Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation have?

Pulled from the Charity Commission register — filing behaviour, board size, and workforce where reported.

  • Accounts filed on time

    Filing status: late

  • Trustee board size (3–12)

    10 trustees on the Charity Commission register

  • Workforce on register

    15 employees · 35 volunteers (2:1 volunteer-to-staff)

Fundraising Regulator

Status not yet checked

Separate from our financial scores — shows whether the charity follows the Code of Fundraising Practice.

Check Fundraising Regulator →

Official register

Reg 1196719

Full trustee list, accounts, and regulatory history on the Charity Commission.

View on Charity Commission →

Trustees & officers

  • ANDREW SHIELD since 2016
  • MARK KENWAY LAMBERT since 2021
  • RAZI SHEHAB AHMED since 2021
  • Justin David Hopwood since 2021
  • NIGEL ROBERT HILL since 2021
  • PETER BOORMAN since 2018
  • Claire Jane Nobes since 2022
  • Dr Jane Ebelechukwu Khawaja since 2022
  • SYBIL RUSCOE since 2021
  • Richard Gregory Bernard since 2025
How we score charities +

The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK regulator filings (Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR and CCNI). Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.

Full methodology →

Accountability & Transparency

Scored from filings

40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).

Financial Health

Scored from filings

30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).

Financial Efficiency

Scored from filings

20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).

Community Support

Scored from filings

10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.

Overall score

Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.

How have Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's finances changed over five years?

£0k £300k £600k £900k £1200k 2022 2023 2024 Income 2022: £993k Spending 2022: £842k Cause spend 2022: £0k Income 2023: £950k Spending 2023: £990k Cause spend 2023: £0k Income 2024: £1,112k Spending 2024: £1,071k Cause spend 2024: £0k
  • Income
  • Spending
  • Cause spend

Values in £ thousands · Cause spend plotted only when the filing discloses a split · Source: Charity Commission accounts

What are the key facts about Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation?

Overall score
74/100 (3★)
Income
£1.1m
Cause spend
Not disclosed
Reg number
1196719
Scope
Local (bristol)
Reserves
5 months
Trustees
10
Accounts year
2024
Filing
late

Where GLOUCESTERSHIRE CRICKET FOUNDATION sits

The causes this charity is classified under, and other charities working nearby.

Similar disability charities

Top-rated peers by CharityCompare score

How can you share Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's rating?

Share: XLinkedInFacebookBluesky

Opens a printer-friendly view of this profile for Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation.

For this charity

How do you add Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's rating to your site?

Free to use — a lightweight HTML badge or an embeddable score widget, each linking back to this independent profile and our methodology.

What red flags does Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation have?

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's rating, finances, and Charity Commission status.

Is Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation a good charity? +

Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation scores 74 out of 100 (3 stars — Needs improvement) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, our independent read of its UK regulator filings. Its recent filings do not disclose a charitable-activities spend split and its accounts are late. That reflects how transparent and financially healthy it looks on paper — it does not measure the real-world impact of its work, so treat it as one factor alongside the cause you care about. CharityCompare never tells you where to donate.

Is Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation a legitimate charity? +

Yes — Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation is a legitimate registered charity (charity number 1196719). Verify it on the official register: https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/1196719. Registration proves status; Clarity Score then summarises filing transparency on paper, not programme impact.

What is Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's charity number? +

Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's charity number is 1196719. Check that number on the official register (Charity Commission, OSCR or CCNI) or this CharityCompare profile before you donate — scammers sometimes reuse real numbers on fake appeals.

What is Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's charity rating? +

Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation scores 74 out of 100 on CharityCompare (3 stars — Needs improvement). The Clarity Score V1 sums four pillars from UK regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 pts), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10). Stars use the same bands as those labels — 90+ is 5★ Exceptional. It is not an impact ranking.

Does Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation have reviews and complaints? +

CharityCompare does not host public user reviews for Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation. Instead you get a filing-based Clarity Score, cause spend, reserves and red flags such as late accounts (1 filing concern(s) noted on this profile). For formal complaints about a charity, contact the Charity Commission, OSCR, CCNI or the Fundraising Regulator as appropriate.

How much of my donation reaches Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation? +

Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation does not disclose a charitable-activities spend split in its recent UK regulator filings, so there is no official figure for how much of a donation reaches the cause. CharityCompare reports this as "not disclosed" rather than assuming a number.

What are Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's overheads? +

Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's recent UK regulator filings do not disclose a fundraising or governance cost split, so no official overhead percentage is available. The filings CharityCompare uses do not publish CEO or senior-staff pay, so we cannot say what Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's chief executive is paid — where disclosure rules apply, senior pay appears in the trustees' annual report on the Charity Commission register.

How much income does Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation receive? +

Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation reported £1.1m total income in its 2024 accounts, based on UK regulator filings. Five-year trend: growing.

Are Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's accounts up to date? +

Filing status: late (last filing 2026-06-24). CharityCompare flags late or missing accounts separately from the financial score.

Where is Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation based? +

Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation is listed at Bristol · BS7 9EJ, focused on disability.

How does CharityCompare score Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation? +

We calculate a Clarity Score of 0–100 from four pillars in Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 points — filing history, trustees, policies), Financial Health (30 — reserves, income trend, debt), Financial Efficiency (20 — cause spend and fundraising cost, on a graduated scale) and Community Support (10 — volunteer-to-staff ratio). An open statutory inquiry scores 0. The score measures reporting on paper, not programme impact. CharityCompare is free for donors, takes no commission on donations, and scores cannot be bought.

How often is this page updated? +

This profile was last updated on 17 July 2026 from the latest UK regulator data available to CharityCompare, and Gloucestershire Cricket Foundation's most recent accounts cover 2024. Scores and figures refresh whenever we re-ingest the register, so the page reflects our latest data pull rather than a one-off review.