Poverty relief · Reg 1077897
Food for All
Charity rating & review
78/100 Clarity Score · 4 stars · Charity Commission filings · How we score
Clarity score
Good
Quick answer
Is Food for All a good charity?
Food for All scores 78/100 (4 stars, Good) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, calculated from its UK regulator filings. Its latest accounts year is 2025 (£511k total income, 98% of spending on charitable activities). This reflects financial transparency and stewardship on paper — not the real-world impact of its programmes. See the full breakdown.
Donate
How can you give to FOOD FOR ALL?
You leave CharityCompare to complete a donation on the official FOOD FOR ALL form. We do not process payments or take commission. Opens their official online donation form.
What does Food for All do?
Food for All is a registered charity (no. 1077897) working in poverty relief across the United Kingdom. Its latest Charity Commission filing directs 98% of spending to charitable activities, holding roughly 7 months of reserves, though its recent accounts were filed late. Reported income has been broadly stable over recent years. CharityCompare's Clarity Score rates the organisation only from public Charity Commission accounts — accountability, financial health, efficiency and community support — not the quality or impact of its programmes.
Summarised from public filings — Food for All hasn't added its own description yet. Work here? Add it free →
In short: FOOD FOR ALL scores 78 out of 100 (4 stars). 98% average program spend (2-year average, disclosed years only). Review the pillar breakdown below.
What is Food for All?
Food for All has a Clarity Score of 78 out of 100 on CharityCompare (4 stars, Good). Charity Commission registration number 1077897. Status: Registered. Primary cause area: Poverty relief. Latest accounts year 2025: total income £511k, with 98% of expenditure on charitable activities. Accounts filing: late. Reserves: approximately 7 months of operating costs. 2 filing concern(s) noted on this profile. Scores are independent and based on official filings — not a donation recommendation.
Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .
Overall score
78/100
4★ · Good
Cause spend
98%
2-yr avg · charitable activities
Accountability
55/100
Finance beacon
Income
£511k
Latest year 2025
Reserves
7 mo
Months of running costs
Accounts filing
Late
Check register
Fundraising efficiency not stated · 3% overhead · Website on register · Confidence: medium
How does FOOD FOR ALL compare?
Clarity Score percentile against similar UK charities — the share of peers FOOD FOR ALL scores higher than.
Scores higher than 43% of 2,187 charities in its income band · 78/100 vs 79 peer average (marker).
Scores higher than 44% of 1,502 charities in this cause · 78/100 vs 78 peer average (marker).
How reliable is Food for All's data?
- Source
- Charity Commission (England & Wales)
- Accounts year
- 2025
- Filing date
- Profile reviewed
Medium confidence — some data missing or late
Scores reflect the latest annual accounts on the register. Clarity Score measures how clearly the charity accounts for money in those filings — not programme impact.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Sources: Charity Commission for England and Wales, Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator and Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. Open Government Licence v3.0 .
What is Food for All's Beacon report?
Detailed accountability and finance metrics from UK regulator filings — structured for transparency in our four-beacon report.
Accountability & Transparency
Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.
55/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Filing history (5 years) 100% on-time over five years = 15 pts · one late filing = 5 pts · two or more = 0 pts. | 0% | 0/15 pts |
| Trustee oversight Three or more trustees on the register = 15 pts, scaled down for fewer (governance red flag below three). | 100% | 10 trustees · 15/15 pts |
| Declared policies Safeguarding (4) · conflict of interest (3) · volunteer management (3) — from Charity Commission annual return. | 70% | 7/10 pts |
Financial Health
Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.
87/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Reserves (months of cash) 3–24 months = full marks, tapering on both sides · 0 months or 4+ years (hoarding) = 0 pts. | 100% | 7 months · 15/15 pts |
| Income stability / growth +20% or more over the window = 10 pts · flat = 5 pts · −20% or worse = 0 pts, scaled between. | 60% | 6/10 pts · 3-year average |
| Liabilities to assets 0% liabilities-to-assets = 5 pts, scaling down to 0 pts at 60%+ debt. | 100% | 4% · 5/5 pts |
Financial Efficiency
How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.
100/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Program expense ratio 90%+ on charitable activities = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 50% or below. | 100% | 98% · 10/10 pts (3-year average) |
| Fundraising efficiency ≤10p to raise £1 = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 40p or above (fundraising cost ÷ income). | 100% | 0p per £1 income · 10/10 pts (3-year average) |
Community Support
Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.
100/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Volunteer-to-staff ratio Volunteers at 2x staff or more = full marks · no volunteers = 0 pts, scaled between. | 100% | 300 volunteers / 2 staff · 10/10 pts |
What is Food for All's Clarity Score?
78/100 total · Good · 4 of 5 stars
Four pillars (40 + 30 + 20 + 10 points) from Charity Commission filings — see methodology for full weightings.
Accountability & Transparency
Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.
55/100
Financial Health
Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.
87/100
Financial Efficiency
How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.
100/100
Community Support
Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.
100/100
How much does Food for All raise and spend?
Latest filed year 2025 · Source: Charity Commission filings
| Category | Amount | % of spend |
|---|---|---|
| Total income | £511k | — |
| Total expenditure | £462k | — |
| Charitable activities | £462k | 100% |
| Governance & admin | £41k | 9% |
Where does the money go?
Latest accounts (2025) · £462k spent
- Charitable activities100% · £462k
- Governance9% · £41k
What trust indicators does Food for All have?
Pulled from the Charity Commission register — filing behaviour, board size, and workforce where reported.
-
Accounts filed on time
Filing status: late
-
Trustee board size (3–12)
10 trustees on the Charity Commission register
-
Workforce on register
2 employees · 300 volunteers (150:1 volunteer-to-staff)
Fundraising Regulator
Status not yet checked
Separate from our financial scores — shows whether the charity follows the Code of Fundraising Practice.
Check Fundraising Regulator →Official register
Reg 1077897
Full trustee list, accounts, and regulatory history on the Charity Commission.
View on Charity Commission →Trustees & officers
- VINCENT LANE
- PETER O GRADY
- Raakhi Kanadia since 2025
- Thomas Evans since 2025
- Mohan Luthra since 2025
- Rita Horn since 2025
- Dr Martin Wood since 2025
- Shivani Thakkar since 2025
- Ian Ulyatt since 2025
- Rajiv Jagdish Nandah since 2025
How we score charities +
The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK regulator filings (Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR and CCNI). Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.
Accountability & Transparency
Scored from filings
40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).
Financial Health
Scored from filings
30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).
Financial Efficiency
Scored from filings
20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).
Community Support
Scored from filings
10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.
Overall score
Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.
How have Food for All's finances changed over five years?
- Income
- Spending
- Cause spend
Values in £ thousands · Cause spend plotted only when the filing discloses a split · Source: Charity Commission accounts
What are the key facts about Food for All?
- Overall score
- 78/100 (4★)
- Income
- £511k
- Cause spend
- 98% of expenditure
- Reg number
- 1077897
- Scope
- UK-wide
- Reserves
- 7 months
- Trustees
- 10
- Accounts year
- 2025
- Filing
- late
How does FOOD FOR ALL compare, and where else can you look?
Where FOOD FOR ALL sits
The causes this charity is classified under, and other charities working nearby.
Similar poverty relief charities
Top-rated peers by CharityCompare score
- AMOS TRUST 100/100 · £2.6m
- SUFRA - NW LONDON 100/100 · £1.7m
- WILDERNESS FOUNDATION UK 100/100 · £1.6m
- BIRMINGHAM CITY MISSION 100/100 · £1.4m
How can you share Food for All's rating?
Opens a printer-friendly view of this profile for Food for All.
For this charity
How do you add Food for All's rating to your site?
Free to use — a lightweight HTML badge or an embeddable score widget, each linking back to this independent profile and our methodology.
What red flags does Food for All have?
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about Food for All's rating, finances, and Charity Commission status.
Is Food for All a good charity? +
Food for All scores 78 out of 100 (4 stars — Good) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, our independent read of its UK regulator filings. Around 98% of its spending goes to charitable activities and its accounts are late. That reflects how transparent and financially healthy it looks on paper — it does not measure the real-world impact of its work, so treat it as one factor alongside the cause you care about. CharityCompare never tells you where to donate.
Is Food for All a legitimate charity? +
Yes — Food for All is a legitimate registered charity (charity number 1077897). Verify it on the official register: https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/1077897. Registration proves status; Clarity Score then summarises filing transparency on paper, not programme impact.
What is Food for All's charity number? +
Food for All's charity number is 1077897. Check that number on the official register (Charity Commission, OSCR or CCNI) or this CharityCompare profile before you donate — scammers sometimes reuse real numbers on fake appeals.
What is Food for All's charity rating? +
Food for All scores 78 out of 100 on CharityCompare (4 stars — Good). The Clarity Score V1 sums four pillars from UK regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 pts), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10). Stars use the same bands as those labels — 90+ is 5★ Exceptional. It is not an impact ranking.
Does Food for All have reviews and complaints? +
CharityCompare does not host public user reviews for Food for All. Instead you get a filing-based Clarity Score, cause spend, reserves and red flags such as late accounts (2 filing concern(s) noted on this profile). For formal complaints about a charity, contact the Charity Commission, OSCR, CCNI or the Fundraising Regulator as appropriate.
How much of my donation reaches Food for All? +
According to its 2025 regulator filing, 98% of Food for All's total spending went to charitable activities (2-yr avg across disclosed years). That is the closest official figure to "how much of your donation reaches the cause" — it is an average across all spending in the filing, not a pound-by-pound breakdown of an individual gift.
What are Food for All's overheads? +
According to its 2025 regulator filing, combined overheads (fundraising plus governance) were about 3% of total expenditure at Food for All. The filings CharityCompare uses do not publish CEO or senior-staff pay, so we cannot say what Food for All's chief executive is paid — where disclosure rules apply, senior pay appears in the trustees' annual report on the Charity Commission register.
How much income does Food for All receive? +
Food for All reported £511k total income in its 2025 accounts, based on UK regulator filings. Five-year trend: stable.
Are Food for All's accounts up to date? +
Filing status: late (last filing 2026-06-24). CharityCompare flags late or missing accounts separately from the financial score.
Where is Food for All based? +
Food for All is listed at Watford · UK-wide · WD25 9QU and operates UK-wide, focused on poverty relief.
How does CharityCompare score Food for All? +
We calculate a Clarity Score of 0–100 from four pillars in Food for All's regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 points — filing history, trustees, policies), Financial Health (30 — reserves, income trend, debt), Financial Efficiency (20 — cause spend and fundraising cost, on a graduated scale) and Community Support (10 — volunteer-to-staff ratio). An open statutory inquiry scores 0. The score measures reporting on paper, not programme impact. CharityCompare is free for donors, takes no commission on donations, and scores cannot be bought.
How often is this page updated? +
This profile was last updated on 17 July 2026 from the latest UK regulator data available to CharityCompare, and Food for All's most recent accounts cover 2025. Scores and figures refresh whenever we re-ingest the register, so the page reflects our latest data pull rather than a one-off review.