Skip to content
CharityCompare

The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent

Charity rating & review

51/100 Clarity Score · 2 stars · Charity Commission filings · How we score

Verified · Charity Commission data
51 /100

Clarity score

Poor

Donate

Quick answer

Is The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent a good charity?

The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent scores 51/100 (2 stars, Poor) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, calculated from its UK regulator filings. Its latest accounts year is 2025 (£3.9m total income, 56% of spending on charitable activities). This reflects financial transparency and stewardship on paper — not the real-world impact of its programmes. See the full breakdown.

Maidstone · UK-wide · ME1 1SU Reg 207100 Registered charity Official website Charity Commission register

What does The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent do?

The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent is a registered charity (no. 207100) working in environment across the United Kingdom. Its latest Charity Commission filing directs 56% of spending to charitable activities, holding roughly 320 months of reserves, and files its annual accounts on time. Reported income has been growing (≈7% a year). CharityCompare's Clarity Score rates the organisation only from public Charity Commission accounts — accountability, financial health, efficiency and community support — not the quality or impact of its programmes.

Summarised from public filings — The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent hasn't added its own description yet. Work here? Add it free →

In short: THE WARDENS AND ASSISTANTS OF ROCHESTER BRIDGE IN THE COUNTY OF KENT scores 51 out of 100 (2 stars). 56% average program spend (3-year average). Review the pillar breakdown below.

What is The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent?

The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent has a Clarity Score of 51 out of 100 on CharityCompare (2 stars, Poor). Charity Commission registration number 207100. Status: Registered. Primary cause area: Environment. Latest accounts year 2025: total income £3.9m, with 56% of expenditure on charitable activities. Accounts filing: up to date. Reserves: approximately 320 months of operating costs. 2 filing concern(s) noted on this profile. Scores are independent and based on official filings — not a donation recommendation.

Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .

Overall score

51/100

2★ · Poor

Cause spend

56%

3-yr avg · charitable activities

Accountability

93/100

Finance beacon

Income

£3.9m

Latest year 2025

Reserves

320 mo

Months of running costs

Accounts filing

On time

Charity Commission

£1.7 raised per £1 fundraising (3-yr avg) · 47% overhead · Website on register · Confidence: high

How does THE WARDENS AND ASSISTANTS OF ROCHESTER BRIDGE IN THE COUNTY OF KENT compare?

Clarity Score percentile against similar UK charities — the share of peers THE WARDENS AND ASSISTANTS OF ROCHESTER BRIDGE IN THE COUNTY OF KENT scores higher than.

Income band (£1m–£5m)4thpercentile

Scores higher than 4% of 2,776 charities in its income band · 51/100 vs 78 peer average (marker).

Environment charities5thpercentile

Scores higher than 5% of 460 charities in this cause · 51/100 vs 76 peer average (marker).

How reliable is The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's data?

Source
Charity Commission (England & Wales)
Accounts year
2025
Filing date
Profile reviewed

High confidence — complete filing data

Scores reflect the latest annual accounts on the register. Clarity Score measures how clearly the charity accounts for money in those filings — not programme impact.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Sources: Charity Commission for England and Wales, Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator and Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. Open Government Licence v3.0 .

What is The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's Beacon report?

Detailed accountability and finance metrics from UK regulator filings — structured for transparency in our four-beacon report.

Accountability & Transparency

Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.

93/100

Accountability & Transparency metrics for THE WARDENS AND ASSISTANTS OF ROCHESTER BRIDGE IN THE COUNTY OF KENT
Metric Score Value
Filing history (5 years)

100% on-time over five years = 15 pts · one late filing = 5 pts · two or more = 0 pts.

100% 15/15 pts
Trustee oversight

Three or more trustees on the register = 15 pts, scaled down for fewer (governance red flag below three).

100% 12 trustees · 15/15 pts
Declared policies

Safeguarding (4) · conflict of interest (3) · volunteer management (3) — from Charity Commission annual return.

70% 7/10 pts

Financial Health

Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.

43/100

Financial Health metrics for THE WARDENS AND ASSISTANTS OF ROCHESTER BRIDGE IN THE COUNTY OF KENT
Metric Score Value
Reserves (months of cash)

3–24 months = full marks, tapering on both sides · 0 months or 4+ years (hoarding) = 0 pts.

0% 320 months · 0/15 pts
Income stability / growth

+20% or more over the window = 10 pts · flat = 5 pts · −20% or worse = 0 pts, scaled between.

80% 8/10 pts · 3-year average
Liabilities to assets

0% liabilities-to-assets = 5 pts, scaling down to 0 pts at 60%+ debt.

100% 2% · 5/5 pts

Financial Efficiency

How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.

5/100

Financial Efficiency metrics for THE WARDENS AND ASSISTANTS OF ROCHESTER BRIDGE IN THE COUNTY OF KENT
Metric Score Value
Program expense ratio

90%+ on charitable activities = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 50% or below.

10% 56% · 1/10 pts (3-year average)
Fundraising efficiency

≤10p to raise £1 = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 40p or above (fundraising cost ÷ income).

0% 58p per £1 income · 0/10 pts (3-year average)

Community Support

Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.

0/100

Community Support metrics for THE WARDENS AND ASSISTANTS OF ROCHESTER BRIDGE IN THE COUNTY OF KENT
Metric Score Value
Volunteer-to-staff ratio

Volunteers at 2x staff or more = full marks · no volunteers = 0 pts, scaled between.

0% Not reported · 0/10 pts

How we calculate beacon scores →

What is The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's Clarity Score?

51/100 total · Poor · 2 of 5 stars

Four pillars (40 + 30 + 20 + 10 points) from Charity Commission filings — see methodology for full weightings.

93/100
Accountability & Transparency
43/100
Financial Health
5/100
Financial Efficiency
0/100
Community Support

Accountability & Transparency

Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.

93/100

Filing history (5 years)15/15 pts
Trustee oversight12 trustees · 15/15 pts
Declared policies7/10 pts

Financial Health

Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.

43/100

Reserves (months of cash)320 months · 0/15 pts
Income stability / growth8/10 pts · 3-year average
Liabilities to assets2% · 5/5 pts

Financial Efficiency

How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.

5/100

Program expense ratio56% · 1/10 pts (3-year average)
Fundraising efficiency58p per £1 income · 0/10 pts (3-year average)

Community Support

Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.

0/100

Volunteer-to-staff ratioNot reported · 0/10 pts

How much does The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent raise and spend?

Latest filed year 2025 · Source: Charity Commission filings

THE WARDENS AND ASSISTANTS OF ROCHESTER BRIDGE IN THE COUNTY OF KENT revenue and expenses for 2025
Category Amount % of spend
Total income £3.9m
Total expenditure £6.6m
Charitable activities £4.0m 61%
Fundraising £2.6m 39%
Governance & admin £104k 2%
61%On charitable activities

Where does the money go?

Latest accounts (2025) · £6.6m spent

  • Charitable activities61%
  • Fundraising39%
  • Governance2%

What trust indicators does The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent have?

Pulled from the Charity Commission register — filing behaviour, board size, and workforce where reported.

  • Accounts filed on time

    up to date · last filing

  • Trustee board size (3–12)

    12 trustees on the Charity Commission register

Fundraising Regulator

Status not yet checked

Separate from our financial scores — shows whether the charity follows the Code of Fundraising Practice.

Check Fundraising Regulator →

Official register

Reg 207100

Full trustee list, accounts, and regulatory history on the Charity Commission.

View on Charity Commission →

Trustees & officers

  • Dr ANNE FRANCES HELEN LOGAN since 1997
  • Russell John Race since 2004
  • RICHARD GEORGE THORNBY since 1997
  • PHILIP FILMER since 2011
  • Raymond Peter Harris since 2013
  • Lars Lemonius since 2018
  • Sarah Virginia Hohler since 2021
  • RUSSELL GRAHAM COOPER Chair · since 2007
  • John Farmer since 2023
  • Dr Helen Marie Pascoe since 2023
  • Ian Michael Summersgill since 2025
  • Alexander John Paterson since 2025
How we score charities +

The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK regulator filings (Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR and CCNI). Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.

Full methodology →

Accountability & Transparency

Scored from filings

40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).

Financial Health

Scored from filings

30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).

Financial Efficiency

Scored from filings

20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).

Community Support

Scored from filings

10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.

Overall score

Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.

How have The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's finances changed over five years?

£0k £2400k £4800k £7200k £9600k 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Income 2021: £2,977k Spending 2021: £9,533k Cause spend 2021: £7,345k Income 2022: £3,383k Spending 2022: £3,887k Cause spend 2022: £1,398k Income 2023: £3,416k Spending 2023: £4,121k Cause spend 2023: £2,097k Income 2024: £3,703k Spending 2024: £4,053k Cause spend 2024: £2,264k Income 2025: £3,859k Spending 2025: £6,639k Cause spend 2025: £4,021k
  • Income
  • Spending
  • Cause spend

Values in £ thousands · Cause spend plotted only when the filing discloses a split · Source: Charity Commission accounts

What are the key facts about The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent?

Overall score
51/100 (2★)
Income
£3.9m
Cause spend
56% of expenditure
Reg number
207100
Scope
UK-wide
Reserves
320 months
Trustees
12
Accounts year
2025
Filing
up to date

Where THE WARDENS AND ASSISTANTS OF ROCHESTER BRIDGE IN THE COUNTY OF KENT sits

The causes this charity is classified under, and other charities working nearby.

Similar environment charities

Top-rated peers by CharityCompare score

How can you share The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's rating?

Share: XLinkedInFacebookBluesky

Opens a printer-friendly view of this profile for The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent.

For this charity

How do you add The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's rating to your site?

Free to use — a lightweight HTML badge or an embeddable score widget, each linking back to this independent profile and our methodology.

What red flags does The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent have?

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's rating, finances, and Charity Commission status.

Is The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent a good charity? +

The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent scores 51 out of 100 (2 stars — Poor) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, our independent read of its UK regulator filings. Around 56% of its spending goes to charitable activities and its accounts are up to date. That reflects how transparent and financially healthy it looks on paper — it does not measure the real-world impact of its work, so treat it as one factor alongside the cause you care about. CharityCompare never tells you where to donate.

Is The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent a legitimate charity? +

Yes — The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent is a legitimate registered charity (charity number 207100). Verify it on the official register: https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/207100. Registration proves status; Clarity Score then summarises filing transparency on paper, not programme impact.

What is The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's charity number? +

The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's charity number is 207100. Check that number on the official register (Charity Commission, OSCR or CCNI) or this CharityCompare profile before you donate — scammers sometimes reuse real numbers on fake appeals.

What is The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's charity rating? +

The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent scores 51 out of 100 on CharityCompare (2 stars — Poor). The Clarity Score V1 sums four pillars from UK regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 pts), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10). Stars use the same bands as those labels — 90+ is 5★ Exceptional. It is not an impact ranking.

Does The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent have reviews and complaints? +

CharityCompare does not host public user reviews for The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent. Instead you get a filing-based Clarity Score, cause spend, reserves and red flags such as late accounts (2 filing concern(s) noted on this profile). For formal complaints about a charity, contact the Charity Commission, OSCR, CCNI or the Fundraising Regulator as appropriate.

How much of my donation reaches The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent? +

According to its 2025 regulator filing, 56% of The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's total spending went to charitable activities (3-yr avg across disclosed years). That is the closest official figure to "how much of your donation reaches the cause" — it is an average across all spending in the filing, not a pound-by-pound breakdown of an individual gift.

What are The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's overheads? +

According to its 2025 regulator filing, fundraising costs were about 44% of total expenditure and combined overheads (fundraising plus governance) were about 47% of total expenditure at The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent. The filings CharityCompare uses do not publish CEO or senior-staff pay, so we cannot say what The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's chief executive is paid — where disclosure rules apply, senior pay appears in the trustees' annual report on the Charity Commission register.

How much income does The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent receive? +

The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent reported £3.9m total income in its 2025 accounts, based on UK regulator filings. Five-year trend: growing.

Are The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's accounts up to date? +

Filing status: up to date (last filing 2026-06-24). CharityCompare flags late or missing accounts separately from the financial score.

Where is The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent based? +

The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent is listed at Maidstone · UK-wide · ME1 1SU and operates UK-wide, focused on environment.

How does CharityCompare score The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent? +

We calculate a Clarity Score of 0–100 from four pillars in The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 points — filing history, trustees, policies), Financial Health (30 — reserves, income trend, debt), Financial Efficiency (20 — cause spend and fundraising cost, on a graduated scale) and Community Support (10 — volunteer-to-staff ratio). An open statutory inquiry scores 0. The score measures reporting on paper, not programme impact. CharityCompare is free for donors, takes no commission on donations, and scores cannot be bought.

How often is this page updated? +

This profile was last updated on 17 July 2026 from the latest UK regulator data available to CharityCompare, and The Wardens and Assistants of Rochester Bridge in the County of Kent's most recent accounts cover 2025. Scores and figures refresh whenever we re-ingest the register, so the page reflects our latest data pull rather than a one-off review.