Health · Reg 1057361
Raising Health
Charity rating & review
83/100 Clarity Score · 4 stars · Charity Commission filings · How we score
Clarity score
Good
Quick answer
Is Raising Health a good charity?
Raising Health scores 83/100 (4 stars, Good) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, calculated from its UK regulator filings. Its latest accounts year is 2025 (£345k total income, 78% of spending on charitable activities). This reflects financial transparency and stewardship on paper — not the real-world impact of its programmes. See the full breakdown.
Donate
How can you give to RAISING HEALTH?
You leave CharityCompare to complete a donation on the official RAISING HEALTH form. We do not process payments or take commission. Opens their official online donation form.
What does Raising Health do?
Raising Health is a registered charity (no. 1057361) working in health in Leicester · LE3 8TB. Its latest Charity Commission filing directs 78% of spending to charitable activities, holding roughly 6 months of reserves, and files its annual accounts on time. Reported income has been declining (≈21% a year). CharityCompare's Clarity Score rates the organisation only from public Charity Commission accounts — accountability, financial health, efficiency and community support — not the quality or impact of its programmes.
Summarised from public filings — Raising Health hasn't added its own description yet. Work here? Add it free →
In short: RAISING HEALTH scores 83 out of 100 (4 stars). 78% average program spend (Latest year, disclosed years only). Review the pillar breakdown below.
What is Raising Health?
Raising Health has a Clarity Score of 83 out of 100 on CharityCompare (4 stars, Good). Charity Commission registration number 1057361. Status: Registered. Primary cause area: Health. Latest accounts year 2025: total income £345k, with 78% of expenditure on charitable activities. Accounts filing: up to date. Reserves: approximately 6 months of operating costs. 2 filing concern(s) noted on this profile. Scores are independent and based on official filings — not a donation recommendation.
Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .
Overall score
83/100
4★ · Good
Cause spend
78%
latest year · charitable activities
Accountability
75/100
Finance beacon
Income
£345k
Latest year 2025
Reserves
6 mo
Months of running costs
Accounts filing
On time
Charity Commission
£15.6 raised per £1 fundraising (latest year) · 11% overhead · Website on register · Confidence: high
How does RAISING HEALTH compare?
Clarity Score percentile against similar UK charities — the share of peers RAISING HEALTH scores higher than.
Scores higher than 80% of 972 charities in its income band · 83/100 vs 70 peer average (marker).
Scores higher than 68% of 528 charities in this cause · 83/100 vs 76 peer average (marker).
How reliable is Raising Health's data?
- Source
- Charity Commission (England & Wales)
- Accounts year
- 2025
- Filing date
- Profile reviewed
High confidence — complete filing data
Scores reflect the latest annual accounts on the register. Clarity Score measures how clearly the charity accounts for money in those filings — not programme impact.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Sources: Charity Commission for England and Wales, Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator and Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. Open Government Licence v3.0 .
What is Raising Health's Beacon report?
Detailed accountability and finance metrics from UK regulator filings — structured for transparency in our four-beacon report.
Accountability & Transparency
Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.
75/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Filing history (5 years) 100% on-time over five years = 15 pts · one late filing = 5 pts · two or more = 0 pts. | 100% | 15/15 pts |
| Trustee oversight Three or more trustees on the register = 15 pts, scaled down for fewer (governance red flag below three). | 33% | 1 trustee · 5/15 pts |
| Declared policies Safeguarding (4) · conflict of interest (3) · volunteer management (3) — from Charity Commission annual return. | 100% | 10/10 pts |
Financial Health
Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.
87/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Reserves (months of cash) 3–24 months = full marks, tapering on both sides · 0 months or 4+ years (hoarding) = 0 pts. | 100% | 6 months · 15/15 pts |
| Income stability / growth +20% or more over the window = 10 pts · flat = 5 pts · −20% or worse = 0 pts, scaled between. | 60% | 6/10 pts · 3-year average |
| Liabilities to assets 0% liabilities-to-assets = 5 pts, scaling down to 0 pts at 60%+ debt. | 100% | 0% · 5/5 pts |
Financial Efficiency
How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.
85/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Program expense ratio 90%+ on charitable activities = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 50% or below. | 70% | 78% · 7/10 pts (3-year average) |
| Fundraising efficiency ≤10p to raise £1 = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 40p or above (fundraising cost ÷ income). | 100% | 4p per £1 income · 10/10 pts (3-year average) |
Community Support
Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.
100/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Volunteer-to-staff ratio Volunteers at 2x staff or more = full marks · no volunteers = 0 pts, scaled between. | 100% | 40 volunteers / 3 staff · 10/10 pts |
What is Raising Health's Clarity Score?
83/100 total · Good · 4 of 5 stars
Four pillars (40 + 30 + 20 + 10 points) from Charity Commission filings — see methodology for full weightings.
Accountability & Transparency
Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.
75/100
Financial Health
Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.
87/100
Financial Efficiency
How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.
85/100
Community Support
Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.
100/100
How much does Raising Health raise and spend?
Latest filed year 2025 · Source: Charity Commission filings
| Category | Amount | % of spend |
|---|---|---|
| Total income | £345k | — |
| Total expenditure | £476k | — |
| Charitable activities | Not disclosed | — |
Where does the money go?
Latest accounts (2025) · £476k spent. Not disclosed in this filing — the Charity Commission return omits the charitable-activities split.
What trust indicators does Raising Health have?
Pulled from the Charity Commission register — filing behaviour, board size, and workforce where reported.
-
Accounts filed on time
up to date · last filing
-
Trustee board size (3–12)
1 trustees on the Charity Commission register
-
Workforce on register
3 employees · 40 volunteers (13:1 volunteer-to-staff)
Fundraising Regulator
Not listed as member
Separate from our financial scores — shows whether the charity follows the Code of Fundraising Practice.
Check Fundraising Regulator →Official register
Reg 1057361
Full trustee list, accounts, and regulatory history on the Charity Commission.
View on Charity Commission →Trustees & officers
- LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST since 2013
How we score charities +
The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK regulator filings (Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR and CCNI). Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.
Accountability & Transparency
Scored from filings
40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).
Financial Health
Scored from filings
30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).
Financial Efficiency
Scored from filings
20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).
Community Support
Scored from filings
10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.
Overall score
Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.
How have Raising Health's finances changed over five years?
- Income
- Spending
- Cause spend
Values in £ thousands · Cause spend plotted only when the filing discloses a split · Source: Charity Commission accounts
What are the key facts about Raising Health?
- Overall score
- 83/100 (4★)
- Income
- £345k
- Cause spend
- 78% of expenditure
- Reg number
- 1057361
- Scope
- Local (leicester)
- Reserves
- 6 months
- Trustees
- 1
- Accounts year
- 2025
- Filing
- up to date
How does RAISING HEALTH compare, and where else can you look?
Where RAISING HEALTH sits
The causes this charity is classified under, and other charities working nearby.
Similar health charities
Top-rated peers by CharityCompare score
- THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSPITAL OF ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM (THE ORDER OF ST JOHN) 100/100 · £2.4m
- THE FARMING COMMUNITY NETWORK 100/100 · £1.8m
- KIDS MATTER 100/100 · £795k
- WOMANKIND 100/100 · £731k
How can you share Raising Health's rating?
Opens a printer-friendly view of this profile for Raising Health.
For this charity
How do you add Raising Health's rating to your site?
Free to use — a lightweight HTML badge or an embeddable score widget, each linking back to this independent profile and our methodology.
What red flags does Raising Health have?
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about Raising Health's rating, finances, and Charity Commission status.
Is Raising Health a good charity? +
Raising Health scores 83 out of 100 (4 stars — Good) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, our independent read of its UK regulator filings. Around 78% of its spending goes to charitable activities and its accounts are up to date. That reflects how transparent and financially healthy it looks on paper — it does not measure the real-world impact of its work, so treat it as one factor alongside the cause you care about. CharityCompare never tells you where to donate.
Is Raising Health a legitimate charity? +
Yes — Raising Health is a legitimate registered charity (charity number 1057361). Verify it on the official register: https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/1057361. Registration proves status; Clarity Score then summarises filing transparency on paper, not programme impact.
What is Raising Health's charity number? +
Raising Health's charity number is 1057361. Check that number on the official register (Charity Commission, OSCR or CCNI) or this CharityCompare profile before you donate — scammers sometimes reuse real numbers on fake appeals.
What is Raising Health's charity rating? +
Raising Health scores 83 out of 100 on CharityCompare (4 stars — Good). The Clarity Score V1 sums four pillars from UK regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 pts), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10). Stars use the same bands as those labels — 90+ is 5★ Exceptional. It is not an impact ranking.
Does Raising Health have reviews and complaints? +
CharityCompare does not host public user reviews for Raising Health. Instead you get a filing-based Clarity Score, cause spend, reserves and red flags such as late accounts (2 filing concern(s) noted on this profile). For formal complaints about a charity, contact the Charity Commission, OSCR, CCNI or the Fundraising Regulator as appropriate.
How much of my donation reaches Raising Health? +
According to its 2025 regulator filing, 78% of Raising Health's total spending went to charitable activities. That is the closest official figure to "how much of your donation reaches the cause" — it is an average across all spending in the filing, not a pound-by-pound breakdown of an individual gift.
What are Raising Health's overheads? +
According to its 2025 regulator filing, fundraising costs were about 22% of total expenditure and combined overheads (fundraising plus governance) were about 11% of total expenditure at Raising Health. The filings CharityCompare uses do not publish CEO or senior-staff pay, so we cannot say what Raising Health's chief executive is paid — where disclosure rules apply, senior pay appears in the trustees' annual report on the Charity Commission register.
How much income does Raising Health receive? +
Raising Health reported £345k total income in its 2025 accounts, based on UK regulator filings. Five-year trend: declining.
Are Raising Health's accounts up to date? +
Filing status: up to date (last filing 2026-06-24). CharityCompare flags late or missing accounts separately from the financial score.
Where is Raising Health based? +
Raising Health is listed at Leicester · LE3 8TB, focused on health.
How does CharityCompare score Raising Health? +
We calculate a Clarity Score of 0–100 from four pillars in Raising Health's regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 points — filing history, trustees, policies), Financial Health (30 — reserves, income trend, debt), Financial Efficiency (20 — cause spend and fundraising cost, on a graduated scale) and Community Support (10 — volunteer-to-staff ratio). An open statutory inquiry scores 0. The score measures reporting on paper, not programme impact. CharityCompare is free for donors, takes no commission on donations, and scores cannot be bought.
How often is this page updated? +
This profile was last updated on 17 July 2026 from the latest UK regulator data available to CharityCompare, and Raising Health's most recent accounts cover 2025. Scores and figures refresh whenever we re-ingest the register, so the page reflects our latest data pull rather than a one-off review.