Homelessness · Reg 1056453
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION
Charity rating & review
77/100 Clarity Score · 3 stars · Charity Commission filings · How we score
Clarity score
Good
Is PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION a good charity?
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION scores 77/100 (Good) on our Clarity Score, with 85% of spending going to charitable activities and accounts late. This reflects financial transparency and stewardship from Charity Commission filings — not the real-world impact of its programmes. See the full breakdown.
Donate
Give to PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION
You leave CharityCompare to complete a donation on the official PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION form. We do not process payments or take commission. Opens their official online donation form.
Mission
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION is a registered charity (no. 1056453) working in homelessness across the United Kingdom. Its latest Charity Commission filing directs 85% of spending to charitable activities, holding roughly 4 months of reserves, though its recent accounts were filed late. Reported income has been declining over recent years. CharityCompare's Clarity Score rates the organisation only from public Charity Commission accounts — accountability, financial health, efficiency and community support — not the quality or impact of its programmes.
In short: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION scores 77 out of 100 (3 stars). 85% average program spend (3-year average). Review the pillar breakdown below.
Overview
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION has a Clarity Score of 77 out of 100 on CharityCompare (3 stars, Good). Charity Commission registration number 1056453. Status: Registered. Primary cause area: Homelessness. Latest accounts year 2021: total income £5.5m, with 85% of expenditure on charitable activities. Accounts filing: late. Reserves: approximately 4 months of operating costs. 1 filing concern(s) noted on this profile. Scores are independent and based on official filings — not a donation recommendation.
Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .
Overall score
77/100
3★ · Good
Cause spend
85%
3-yr avg · charitable activities
Accountability
68/100
Finance beacon
Income
£5.5m
Latest year 2021
Reserves
4 mo
Months of running costs
Accounts filing
Late
Check register
£6.0 raised per £1 fundraising (3-yr avg) · 16% overhead · Website on register · Confidence: medium
How PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION compares
Clarity Score benchmarked against similar UK charities — higher is better.
Ranks higher than 46% of 716 charities in its income band.
Ranks higher than 50% of 147 charities in this cause.
Data & confidence
- Source
- Charity Commission (E&W)
- Accounts year
- 2021
- Filing date
- 2026-06-24 00:00:00.0000000
- Profile reviewed
- 2026-06-25
Medium confidence — some data missing or late
Scores reflect the latest annual accounts on the register. Impact, leadership, and culture beacons require information beyond public filings.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Charity Commission for England and Wales . Open Government Licence v3.0 .
Beacon report
Detailed accountability and finance metrics from Charity Commission filings — structured for transparency in our four-beacon report.
Accountability & Transparency
Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.
68/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Filing history (5 years) 100% on-time over five years = 15 pts · one late filing = 5 pts · two or more = 0 pts. | 33% | 5/15 pts |
| Trustee oversight Three or more trustees on the register = 15 pts · one or two = 0 pts (governance red flag). | 100% | 3 trustees · 15/15 pts |
| Declared policies Safeguarding (4) · conflict of interest (3) · volunteer management (3) — from Charity Commission annual return. | 70% | 7/10 pts |
Financial Health
Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.
100/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Reserves (months of cash) 3–24 months = 15 pts · 1–3 months = 7 pts · under 1 month or over 3 years (hoarding) = 0 pts. | 100% | 4 months · 15/15 pts |
| Income stability / growth Positive or stable three-year revenue trend = 10 pts · sustained decline = 0 pts. | 100% | 10/10 pts · 3-year average |
| Liabilities to assets Low debt (< 30% liabilities to assets) = 5 pts · high debt = 0 pts. | 100% | 17% · 5/5 pts |
Financial Efficiency
How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.
100/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Program expense ratio ≥ 75% on charitable activities = 10 pts · 60–75% = 5 pts · below 60% = 0 pts. | 100% | 85% · 10/10 pts (3-year average) |
| Fundraising efficiency Spends ≤ £0.20 to raise £1 = 10 pts · £0.21–£0.35 = 5 pts · above £0.35 = 0 pts (fundraising cost ÷ income). | 100% | 17p per £1 income · 10/10 pts (3-year average) |
Community Support
Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.
0/100
| Metric | Score | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Volunteer-to-staff ratio More volunteers than paid staff = 10 pts · equal mix = 5 pts · no volunteers = 0 pts. | 0% | 10 volunteers / 67 staff · 0/10 pts |
Clarity Score
77/100 total · Good · 3 of 4 stars
Four pillars (40 + 30 + 20 + 10 points) from Charity Commission filings — see methodology for full weightings.
Accountability & Transparency
Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.
68/100
Financial Health
Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.
100/100
Financial Efficiency
How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.
100/100
Community Support
Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.
0/100
Revenue & expenses
Latest filed year 2021 · Source: Charity Commission annual accounts
| Category | Amount | % of spend |
|---|---|---|
| Total income | £5.5m | — |
| Total expenditure | £4.9m | — |
| Charitable activities | £4.0m | 82% |
| Fundraising | £876k | 18% |
| Governance & admin | £14k | 0% |
Where the money goes
Latest accounts (2021) · £4.9m spent
- Charitable activities82% · £4.0m
- Fundraising18% · £876k
- Governance0% · £14k
Trust indicators
Pulled from the Charity Commission register — filing behaviour, board size, and workforce where reported.
-
Accounts filed on time
Filing status: late
-
Trustee board size (3–12)
3 trustees on the Charity Commission register
-
Workforce on register
67 employees · 10 volunteers (0:1 volunteer-to-staff)
Fundraising Regulator
Status not yet checked
Separate from our financial scores — shows whether the charity follows the Code of Fundraising Practice.
Check Fundraising Regulator →Official register
Reg 1056453
Full trustee list, accounts, and regulatory history on the Charity Commission.
View on Charity Commission →Trustees & officers
- LENE LOVICH
- INGRID NEWKIRK
- Leslie Chappell since 2010
How we score charities +
The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK Charity Commission data. Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10). A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.
Accountability & Transparency
Scored from filings
40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15), declared policies (10).
Financial Health
Scored from filings
30 points — reserves (15), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5).
Financial Efficiency
Scored from filings
20 points — program expense ratio (10), fundraising efficiency (10). Kept at 20% to avoid punishing legitimate infrastructure costs.
Community Support
Scored from filings
10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data.
Overall score
Sum of all pillar points. Translated to stars: 90–100 Exceptional (4★), 75–89 Good (3★), 60–74 Needs improvement (2★), below 60 Poor (1★).
Five-year trends
- Income
- Spending
- Cause spend
Values in £ thousands · Source: Charity Commission accounts
Key facts
- Overall score
- 77/100 (3★)
- Income
- £5.5m
- Cause spend
- 85% of expenditure
- Reg number
- 1056453
- Scope
- UK-wide
- Reserves
- 4 months
- Trustees
- 3
- Accounts year
- 2021
- Filing
- late
Compare & explore
Similar homelessness charities
Top-rated peers by CharityCompare score
- THE WILDLIFE TRUST FOR BEDFORDSHIRE CAMBRIDGESHIRE NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 100/100 · £5.4m
- DOGS TRUST 100/100 · £3.8m
- THE VEGAN SOCIETY 100/100 · £3.5m
- THE LEAGUE AGAINST CRUEL SPORTS 100/100 · £3.3m
Share & export
Opens a printer-friendly view of this profile for PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION.
For this charity
Add your rating to your site
Free to use — a lightweight HTML badge or an embeddable score widget, each linking back to this independent profile and our methodology.
Red flags
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION's rating, finances, and Charity Commission status.
What is PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION's charity rating? +
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION scores 77 out of 100 on CharityCompare (3 stars — Good). The Clarity Score V1 sums four pillars from Charity Commission filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 pts), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10).
Is PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION a good charity to donate to? +
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION scores 77 out of 100 (3 stars — Good) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, our independent read of its Charity Commission filings. Around 85% of its spending goes to charitable activities and its accounts are late. That reflects how transparent and financially healthy it looks on paper — it does not measure the real-world impact of its work, so treat it as one factor alongside the cause you care about. CharityCompare never tells you where to donate.
Is PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION a legitimate UK charity? +
Yes — PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION is registered with the Charity Commission for England and Wales under registration number 1056453. You can verify the entry on the official register.
What is PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION's Charity Commission registration number? +
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION's registration number is 1056453. Official register: https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/1056453
How much income does PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION receive? +
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION reported £5.5m total income in its 2021 accounts, based on Charity Commission filings. Five-year trend: declining.
What percentage of PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION's spending goes to charitable activities? +
Approximately 85% of total expenditure went to charitable activities in the latest filed year. Fundraising was 15% and combined overhead (fundraising plus governance) was 16%.
Are PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION's accounts up to date? +
Filing status: late (last filing 2026-06-24 00:00:00.0000000). CharityCompare flags late or missing accounts separately from the financial score.
Where is PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION based? +
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION is listed at London · UK-wide · EC4N 6AF and operates UK-wide, focused on homelessness.
How does CharityCompare score PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION? +
We analyse Charity Commission annual accounts using three-year averages for program expense, fundraising efficiency, and overhead; working capital from reserves vs average expenditure; liabilities-to-assets from the latest balance sheet when available. Impact, leadership, and culture beacons are not yet assessed from public data alone. See our methodology for weights and thresholds.
Does CharityCompare recommend donating to PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION? +
No. CharityCompare provides independent scores and facts from official filings. We do not tell you where to donate or earn commission from charities.
How can I compare PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION with other charities? +
Use our free compare tool to put PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS (PETA) FOUNDATION side-by-side with other UK charities on scores, finances, and filing status.