Skip to content
CharityCompare

Endangered Species Protection Agency

Charity rating & review

74/100 Clarity Score · 3 stars · Charity Commission filings · How we score

Verified · Charity Commission data
74 /100

Clarity score

Needs improvement

Donate

Quick answer

Is Endangered Species Protection Agency a good charity?

Endangered Species Protection Agency scores 74/100 (3 stars, Needs improvement) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, calculated from its UK regulator filings. Its latest accounts year is 2024 (£926k total income, 95% of spending on charitable activities). This reflects financial transparency and stewardship on paper — not the real-world impact of its programmes. See the full breakdown.

United Kingdom Reg 1164052 Registered charity Official website Charity Commission register

What does Endangered Species Protection Agency do?

Endangered Species Protection Agency is a registered charity (no. 1164052) working in wildlife conservation across the United Kingdom. Its latest Charity Commission filing directs 95% of spending to charitable activities, holding roughly 2 months of reserves, and files its annual accounts on time. Reported income has been declining (≈20% a year). CharityCompare's Clarity Score rates the organisation only from public Charity Commission accounts — accountability, financial health, efficiency and community support — not the quality or impact of its programmes.

Summarised from public filings — Endangered Species Protection Agency hasn't added its own description yet. Work here? Add it free →

In short: ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY scores 74 out of 100 (3 stars). 95% average program spend (3-year average). Review the pillar breakdown below.

What is Endangered Species Protection Agency?

Endangered Species Protection Agency has a Clarity Score of 74 out of 100 on CharityCompare (3 stars, Needs improvement). Charity Commission registration number 1164052. Status: Registered. Primary cause area: Wildlife conservation. Latest accounts year 2024: total income £926k, with 95% of expenditure on charitable activities. Accounts filing: up to date. Reserves: approximately 2 months of operating costs. No major red flags from our filing review. Scores are independent and based on official filings — not a donation recommendation.

Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .

Overall score

74/100

3★ · Needs improvement

Cause spend

95%

3-yr avg · charitable activities

Accountability

100/100

Finance beacon

Income

£926k

Latest year 2024

Reserves

2 mo

Months of running costs

Accounts filing

On time

Charity Commission

£19.4 raised per £1 fundraising (3-yr avg) · 5% overhead · Website on register · Confidence: high

How does ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY compare?

Clarity Score percentile against similar UK charities — the share of peers ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY scores higher than.

Income band (£500k–£1m)34thpercentile

Scores higher than 34% of 2,187 charities in its income band · 74/100 vs 79 peer average (marker).

Wildlife conservation charities36thpercentile

Scores higher than 36% of 25 charities in this cause · 74/100 vs 80 peer average (marker).

How reliable is Endangered Species Protection Agency's data?

Source
Charity Commission (England & Wales)
Accounts year
2024
Filing date
Profile reviewed

High confidence — complete filing data

Scores reflect the latest annual accounts on the register. Clarity Score measures how clearly the charity accounts for money in those filings — not programme impact.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Sources: Charity Commission for England and Wales, Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator and Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. Open Government Licence v3.0 .

What is Endangered Species Protection Agency's Beacon report?

Detailed accountability and finance metrics from UK regulator filings — structured for transparency in our four-beacon report.

Accountability & Transparency

Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.

100/100

Accountability & Transparency metrics for ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY
Metric Score Value
Filing history (5 years)

100% on-time over five years = 15 pts · one late filing = 5 pts · two or more = 0 pts.

100% 15/15 pts
Trustee oversight

Three or more trustees on the register = 15 pts, scaled down for fewer (governance red flag below three).

100% 5 trustees · 15/15 pts
Declared policies

Safeguarding (4) · conflict of interest (3) · volunteer management (3) — from Charity Commission annual return.

100% 10/10 pts

Financial Health

Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.

47/100

Financial Health metrics for ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY
Metric Score Value
Reserves (months of cash)

3–24 months = full marks, tapering on both sides · 0 months or 4+ years (hoarding) = 0 pts.

67% 2 months · 10/15 pts
Income stability / growth

+20% or more over the window = 10 pts · flat = 5 pts · −20% or worse = 0 pts, scaled between.

0% 0/10 pts · 3-year average
Liabilities to assets

0% liabilities-to-assets = 5 pts, scaling down to 0 pts at 60%+ debt.

80% 9% · 4/5 pts

Financial Efficiency

How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.

100/100

Financial Efficiency metrics for ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY
Metric Score Value
Program expense ratio

90%+ on charitable activities = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 50% or below.

100% 95% · 10/10 pts (3-year average)
Fundraising efficiency

≤10p to raise £1 = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 40p or above (fundraising cost ÷ income).

100% 5p per £1 income · 10/10 pts (3-year average)

Community Support

Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.

0/100

Community Support metrics for ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY
Metric Score Value
Volunteer-to-staff ratio

Volunteers at 2x staff or more = full marks · no volunteers = 0 pts, scaled between.

0% Not reported · 0/10 pts

How we calculate beacon scores →

What is Endangered Species Protection Agency's Clarity Score?

74/100 total · Needs improvement · 3 of 5 stars

Four pillars (40 + 30 + 20 + 10 points) from Charity Commission filings — see methodology for full weightings.

100/100
Accountability & Transparency
47/100
Financial Health
100/100
Financial Efficiency
0/100
Community Support

Accountability & Transparency

Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.

100/100

Filing history (5 years)15/15 pts
Trustee oversight5 trustees · 15/15 pts
Declared policies10/10 pts

Financial Health

Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.

47/100

Reserves (months of cash)2 months · 10/15 pts
Income stability / growth0/10 pts · 3-year average
Liabilities to assets9% · 4/5 pts

Financial Efficiency

How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.

100/100

Program expense ratio95% · 10/10 pts (3-year average)
Fundraising efficiency5p per £1 income · 10/10 pts (3-year average)

Community Support

Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.

0/100

Volunteer-to-staff ratioNot reported · 0/10 pts

How much does Endangered Species Protection Agency raise and spend?

Latest filed year 2024 · Source: Charity Commission filings

ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY revenue and expenses for 2024
Category Amount % of spend
Total income £926k
Total expenditure £816k
Charitable activities £794k 97%
Fundraising £22k 3%
97%On charitable activities

Where does the money go?

Latest accounts (2024) · £816k spent

  • Charitable activities97%
  • Fundraising3%

What trust indicators does Endangered Species Protection Agency have?

Pulled from the Charity Commission register — filing behaviour, board size, and workforce where reported.

  • Accounts filed on time

    up to date · last filing

  • Trustee board size (3–12)

    5 trustees on the Charity Commission register

Fundraising Regulator

Status not yet checked

Separate from our financial scores — shows whether the charity follows the Code of Fundraising Practice.

Check Fundraising Regulator →

Official register

Reg 1164052

Full trustee list, accounts, and regulatory history on the Charity Commission.

View on Charity Commission →

Trustees & officers

  • MARTIN JOSEPH HEWITT since 2015
  • PETER CARR since 2015
  • Bill Freear since 2015
  • Harold Taylor since 2018
  • Barry Shaw since 2021
How we score charities +

The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK regulator filings (Charity Commission for England and Wales, OSCR and CCNI). Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.

Full methodology →

Accountability & Transparency

Scored from filings

40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).

Financial Health

Scored from filings

30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).

Financial Efficiency

Scored from filings

20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).

Community Support

Scored from filings

10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.

Overall score

Sum of all pillar points. Display stars use the same bands as the labels: 90–100 → 5★ Exceptional; 75–89 → 4★ Good; 60–74 → 3★ Needs improvement; 1–59 → 2★ Poor; 0 → not rated.

How have Endangered Species Protection Agency's finances changed over five years?

£0k £600k £1200k £1800k £2400k 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Income 2020: £2,207k Spending 2020: £2,139k Cause spend 2020: £2,139k Income 2021: £1,230k Spending 2021: £1,426k Cause spend 2021: £1,335k Income 2022: £1,248k Spending 2022: £1,449k Cause spend 2022: £1,351k Income 2023: £1,058k Spending 2023: £1,031k Cause spend 2023: £984k Income 2024: £926k Spending 2024: £816k Cause spend 2024: £794k
  • Income
  • Spending
  • Cause spend

Values in £ thousands · Cause spend plotted only when the filing discloses a split · Source: Charity Commission accounts

What are the key facts about Endangered Species Protection Agency?

Overall score
74/100 (3★)
Income
£926k
Cause spend
95% of expenditure
Reg number
1164052
Scope
UK-wide
Reserves
2 months
Trustees
5
Accounts year
2024
Filing
up to date

Where ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY sits

The causes this charity is classified under, and other charities working nearby.

Similar wildlife conservation charities

Top-rated peers by CharityCompare score

How can you share Endangered Species Protection Agency's rating?

Share: XLinkedInFacebookBluesky

Opens a printer-friendly view of this profile for Endangered Species Protection Agency.

For this charity

How do you add Endangered Species Protection Agency's rating to your site?

Free to use — a lightweight HTML badge or an embeddable score widget, each linking back to this independent profile and our methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about Endangered Species Protection Agency's rating, finances, and Charity Commission status.

Is Endangered Species Protection Agency a good charity? +

Endangered Species Protection Agency scores 74 out of 100 (3 stars — Needs improvement) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, our independent read of its UK regulator filings. Around 95% of its spending goes to charitable activities and its accounts are up to date. That reflects how transparent and financially healthy it looks on paper — it does not measure the real-world impact of its work, so treat it as one factor alongside the cause you care about. CharityCompare never tells you where to donate.

Is Endangered Species Protection Agency a legitimate charity? +

Yes — Endangered Species Protection Agency is a legitimate registered charity (charity number 1164052). Verify it on the official register: https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/1164052. Registration proves status; Clarity Score then summarises filing transparency on paper, not programme impact.

What is Endangered Species Protection Agency's charity number? +

Endangered Species Protection Agency's charity number is 1164052. Check that number on the official register (Charity Commission, OSCR or CCNI) or this CharityCompare profile before you donate — scammers sometimes reuse real numbers on fake appeals.

What is Endangered Species Protection Agency's charity rating? +

Endangered Species Protection Agency scores 74 out of 100 on CharityCompare (3 stars — Needs improvement). The Clarity Score V1 sums four pillars from UK regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 pts), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10). Stars use the same bands as those labels — 90+ is 5★ Exceptional. It is not an impact ranking.

Does Endangered Species Protection Agency have reviews and complaints? +

CharityCompare does not host public user reviews for Endangered Species Protection Agency. Instead you get a filing-based Clarity Score, cause spend, reserves and red flags such as late accounts. For formal complaints about a charity, contact the Charity Commission, OSCR, CCNI or the Fundraising Regulator as appropriate.

How much of my donation reaches Endangered Species Protection Agency? +

According to its 2024 regulator filing, 95% of Endangered Species Protection Agency's total spending went to charitable activities (3-yr avg across disclosed years). That is the closest official figure to "how much of your donation reaches the cause" — it is an average across all spending in the filing, not a pound-by-pound breakdown of an individual gift.

What are Endangered Species Protection Agency's overheads? +

According to its 2024 regulator filing, fundraising costs were about 5% of total expenditure and combined overheads (fundraising plus governance) were about 5% of total expenditure at Endangered Species Protection Agency. The filings CharityCompare uses do not publish CEO or senior-staff pay, so we cannot say what Endangered Species Protection Agency's chief executive is paid — where disclosure rules apply, senior pay appears in the trustees' annual report on the Charity Commission register.

How much income does Endangered Species Protection Agency receive? +

Endangered Species Protection Agency reported £926k total income in its 2024 accounts, based on UK regulator filings. Five-year trend: declining.

Are Endangered Species Protection Agency's accounts up to date? +

Filing status: up to date (last filing 2026-06-24). CharityCompare flags late or missing accounts separately from the financial score.

Where is Endangered Species Protection Agency based? +

Endangered Species Protection Agency is listed at United Kingdom and operates UK-wide, focused on wildlife conservation.

How does CharityCompare score Endangered Species Protection Agency? +

We calculate a Clarity Score of 0–100 from four pillars in Endangered Species Protection Agency's regulator filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 points — filing history, trustees, policies), Financial Health (30 — reserves, income trend, debt), Financial Efficiency (20 — cause spend and fundraising cost, on a graduated scale) and Community Support (10 — volunteer-to-staff ratio). An open statutory inquiry scores 0. The score measures reporting on paper, not programme impact. CharityCompare is free for donors, takes no commission on donations, and scores cannot be bought.

How often is this page updated? +

This profile was last updated on 17 July 2026 from the latest UK regulator data available to CharityCompare, and Endangered Species Protection Agency's most recent accounts cover 2024. Scores and figures refresh whenever we re-ingest the register, so the page reflects our latest data pull rather than a one-off review.