Skip to content
CharityCompare

Redwings Horse Sanctuary

Charity rating & review

83/100 Clarity Score · 4 stars · Charity Commission filings · How we score

Verified · Charity Commission data
Give with confidence
83 /100

Clarity score

Good

Donate

Quick answer

Is Redwings Horse Sanctuary a good charity?

Redwings Horse Sanctuary scores 83/100 (4 stars, Good) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, calculated from its Charity Commission filings. Its latest accounts year is 2024 (£15m total income, 83% of spending on charitable activities). This reflects financial transparency and stewardship on paper — not the real-world impact of its programmes. See the full breakdown.

Norwich · UK-wide · NR15 1SP Reg 1068911 Registered charity Official website Charity Commission register

Mission

Redwings Horse Sanctuary is a registered charity (no. 1068911) working in animals across the United Kingdom. Its latest Charity Commission filing directs 83% of spending to charitable activities, holding roughly 11 months of reserves, and files its annual accounts on time. Reported income has been growing (≈9% a year). CharityCompare's Clarity Score rates the organisation only from public Charity Commission accounts — accountability, financial health, efficiency and community support — not the quality or impact of its programmes.

In short: REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY scores 83 out of 100 (4 stars). 83% average program spend (3-year average). Filings are up to date with no major concerns.

Overview

Redwings Horse Sanctuary has a Clarity Score of 83 out of 100 on CharityCompare (4 stars, Good). Charity Commission registration number 1068911. Status: Registered. Primary cause area: Animals. Latest accounts year 2024: total income £15m, with 83% of expenditure on charitable activities. Accounts filing: up to date. Reserves: approximately 11 months of operating costs. No major red flags from our filing review. Scores are independent and based on official filings — not a donation recommendation.

Data from Charity Commission register, last updated .

Overall score

83/100

4★ · Good

Cause spend

83%

3-yr avg · charitable activities

Accountability

100/100

Finance beacon

Income

£15m

Latest year 2024

Reserves

11 mo

Months of running costs

Accounts filing

On time

Charity Commission

£5.3 raised per £1 fundraising (3-yr avg) · 18% overhead · Website on register · Confidence: high

How REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY compares

Clarity Score percentile against similar UK charities — the share of peers REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY scores higher than.

Income band (£10m+)67thpercentile

Scores higher than 67% of 943 charities in its income band · 83/100 vs 77 peer average (marker).

Animals charities60thpercentile

Scores higher than 60% of 370 charities in this cause · 83/100 vs 78 peer average (marker).

Data & confidence

Source
Charity Commission (E&W)
Accounts year
2024
Filing date
Profile reviewed

High confidence — complete filing data

Scores reflect the latest annual accounts on the register. Impact, leadership, and culture beacons require information beyond public filings.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Sources: Charity Commission for England and Wales, Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator and Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. Open Government Licence v3.0 .

Beacon report

Detailed accountability and finance metrics from Charity Commission filings — structured for transparency in our four-beacon report.

Accountability & Transparency

Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.

100/100

Accountability & Transparency metrics for REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY
Metric Score Value
Filing history (5 years)

100% on-time over five years = 15 pts · one late filing = 5 pts · two or more = 0 pts.

100% 15/15 pts
Trustee oversight

Three or more trustees on the register = 15 pts, scaled down for fewer (governance red flag below three).

100% 5 trustees · 15/15 pts
Declared policies

Safeguarding (4) · conflict of interest (3) · volunteer management (3) — from Charity Commission annual return.

100% 10/10 pts

Financial Health

Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.

93/100

Financial Health metrics for REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY
Metric Score Value
Reserves (months of cash)

3–24 months = full marks, tapering on both sides · 0 months or 4+ years (hoarding) = 0 pts.

100% 11 month · 15/15 pts
Income stability / growth

+20% or more over the window = 10 pts · flat = 5 pts · −20% or worse = 0 pts, scaled between.

80% 8/10 pts · 3-year average
Liabilities to assets

0% liabilities-to-assets = 5 pts, scaling down to 0 pts at 60%+ debt.

100% 2% · 5/5 pts

Financial Efficiency

How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.

75/100

Financial Efficiency metrics for REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY
Metric Score Value
Program expense ratio

90%+ on charitable activities = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 50% or below.

80% 83% · 8/10 pts (3-year average)
Fundraising efficiency

≤10p to raise £1 = full marks, scaling down to 0 pts at 40p or above (fundraising cost ÷ income).

70% 19p per £1 income · 7/10 pts (3-year average)

Community Support

Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.

0/100

Community Support metrics for REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY
Metric Score Value
Volunteer-to-staff ratio

Volunteers at 2x staff or more = full marks · no volunteers = 0 pts, scaled between.

0% 36 volunteers / 420 staff · 0/10 pts

How we calculate beacon scores →

Clarity Score

83/100 total · Good · 4 of 5 stars

Four pillars (40 + 30 + 20 + 10 points) from Charity Commission filings — see methodology for full weightings.

100/100
Accountability & Transparency
93/100
Financial Health
75/100
Financial Efficiency
0/100
Community Support

Accountability & Transparency

Baseline trust from filing discipline, board oversight, and declared governance policies.

100/100

Filing history (5 years)15/15 pts
Trustee oversight5 trustees · 15/15 pts
Declared policies10/10 pts

Financial Health

Stability and solvency — reserves, revenue trend, and debt from Charity Commission accounts.

93/100

Reserves (months of cash)11 month · 15/15 pts
Income stability / growth8/10 pts · 3-year average
Liabilities to assets2% · 5/5 pts

Financial Efficiency

How efficiently funds reach the cause — program spend and fundraising cost ratios.

75/100

Program expense ratio83% · 8/10 pts (3-year average)
Fundraising efficiency19p per £1 income · 7/10 pts (3-year average)

Community Support

Grassroots backing from Charity Commission workforce data — volunteers vs paid staff.

0/100

Volunteer-to-staff ratio36 volunteers / 420 staff · 0/10 pts

Revenue & expenses

Latest filed year 2024 · Source: Charity Commission annual accounts

REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY revenue and expenses for 2024
Category Amount % of spend
Total income £15m
Total expenditure £17m
Charitable activities £15m 84%
Fundraising £2.8m 16%
Governance & admin £70k 0%
84%On charitable activities

Where the money goes

Latest accounts (2024) · £17m spent

  • Charitable activities84%
  • Fundraising16%
  • Governance0%

Trust indicators

Pulled from the Charity Commission register — filing behaviour, board size, and workforce where reported.

  • Accounts filed on time

    up to date · last filing

  • Trustee board size (3–12)

    5 trustees on the Charity Commission register

  • Workforce on register

    420 employees · 36 volunteers (0:1 volunteer-to-staff)

Fundraising Regulator

Status not yet checked

Separate from our financial scores — shows whether the charity follows the Code of Fundraising Practice.

Check Fundraising Regulator →

Official register

Reg 1068911

Full trustee list, accounts, and regulatory history on the Charity Commission.

View on Charity Commission →

Trustees & officers

  • MARK LITTLE Chair · since 2020
  • Paul Fileman since 2017
  • Tom Sharpe since 2020
  • Ian Murray Scott since 2021
  • Daren Moore FCCA since 2023
How we score charities +

The Clarity Score is a 100-point rating from UK Charity Commission data. Four pillars — Accountability & Transparency (40), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10) — each scored on a continuous scale, not pass/fail cutoffs. A statutory inquiry sets the score to 0 automatically.

Full methodology →

Accountability & Transparency

Scored from filings

40 points — filing history (15), trustee oversight (15, scaling up to a board of three or more), declared policies (10).

Financial Health

Scored from filings

30 points — reserves (15, full marks 3–24 months, tapering on both sides), income stability (10), liabilities to assets (5, scaling down as debt rises).

Financial Efficiency

Scored from filings

20 points — program expense ratio and fundraising cost, each on a graduated scale (not a single cutoff). Kept at 20% of the total: financial-ratio scoring alone is not a reliable effectiveness signal (see "why not just an overhead ratio?" below).

Community Support

Scored from filings

10 points — volunteer-to-staff ratio from Charity Commission workforce data, scaling continuously up to a 2:1 ratio.

Overall score

Sum of all pillar points. Display stars map the 0–100 score onto a familiar 5★ scale (≈20 points per star): 90–100 → 5★, 70–89 → 4★, 50–69 → 3★, 30–49 → 2★, 1–29 → 1★.

Five-year trends

£0k £4400k £8800k £13200k £17600k 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Income 2020: £10,321k Spending 2020: £12,291k Cause spend 2020: £10,302k Income 2021: £14,045k Spending 2021: £12,789k Cause spend 2021: £10,805k Income 2022: £13,336k Spending 2022: £14,203k Cause spend 2022: £11,385k Income 2023: £15,393k Spending 2023: £15,812k Cause spend 2023: £13,174k Income 2024: £14,836k Spending 2024: £17,401k Cause spend 2024: £14,642k
  • Income
  • Spending
  • Cause spend

Values in £ thousands · Cause spend plotted only when the filing discloses a split · Source: Charity Commission accounts

Key facts

Overall score
83/100 (4★)
Income
£15m
Cause spend
83% of expenditure
Reg number
1068911
Scope
UK-wide
Reserves
11 months
Trustees
5
Accounts year
2024
Filing
up to date

Similar animals charities

Top-rated peers by CharityCompare score

Share & export

Share: XLinkedInFacebookBluesky

Opens a printer-friendly view of this profile for Redwings Horse Sanctuary.

For this charity

Add your rating to your site

Free to use — a lightweight HTML badge or an embeddable score widget, each linking back to this independent profile and our methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about Redwings Horse Sanctuary's rating, finances, and Charity Commission status.

Is Redwings Horse Sanctuary a good charity? +

Redwings Horse Sanctuary scores 83 out of 100 (4 stars — Good) on CharityCompare's Clarity Score, our independent read of its Charity Commission filings. Around 83% of its spending goes to charitable activities and its accounts are up to date. That reflects how transparent and financially healthy it looks on paper — it does not measure the real-world impact of its work, so treat it as one factor alongside the cause you care about. CharityCompare never tells you where to donate.

Is Redwings Horse Sanctuary a legitimate charity? +

Yes — Redwings Horse Sanctuary is registered with the Charity Commission for England and Wales under registration number 1068911. You can verify the entry on the official register: https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/1068911

What is Redwings Horse Sanctuary's charity rating? +

Redwings Horse Sanctuary scores 83 out of 100 on CharityCompare (4 stars — Good). The Clarity Score V1 sums four pillars from Charity Commission filings: Accountability & Transparency (40 pts), Financial Health (30), Financial Efficiency (20), and Community Support (10).

How much of my donation reaches Redwings Horse Sanctuary? +

According to its 2024 Charity Commission filing, 83% of Redwings Horse Sanctuary's total spending went to charitable activities (3-yr avg across disclosed years). That is the closest official figure to "how much of your donation reaches the cause" — it is an average across all spending in the filing, not a pound-by-pound breakdown of an individual gift.

What are Redwings Horse Sanctuary's overheads? +

According to its 2024 Charity Commission filing, fundraising costs were about 17% of total expenditure and combined overheads (fundraising plus governance) were about 18% of total expenditure at Redwings Horse Sanctuary. The filings CharityCompare uses do not publish CEO or senior-staff pay, so we cannot say what Redwings Horse Sanctuary's chief executive is paid — where disclosure rules apply, senior pay appears in the trustees' annual report on the Charity Commission register.

How much income does Redwings Horse Sanctuary receive? +

Redwings Horse Sanctuary reported £15m total income in its 2024 accounts, based on Charity Commission filings. Five-year trend: growing.

Are Redwings Horse Sanctuary's accounts up to date? +

Filing status: up to date (last filing 2026-06-24). CharityCompare flags late or missing accounts separately from the financial score.

Where is Redwings Horse Sanctuary based? +

Redwings Horse Sanctuary is listed at Norwich · UK-wide · NR15 1SP and operates UK-wide, focused on animals.

How does CharityCompare score Redwings Horse Sanctuary? +

We analyse Charity Commission annual accounts using three-year averages for program expense, fundraising efficiency, and overhead (disclosed years only); working capital from reserves vs average expenditure; liabilities-to-assets from the latest balance sheet when available. Impact, leadership, and culture beacons are not yet assessed from public data alone. See our methodology for weights and thresholds. CharityCompare is free for donors, takes no commission on donations, and scores cannot be bought.

How often is this page updated? +

This profile was last updated on 17 July 2026 from the latest Charity Commission data available to CharityCompare, and Redwings Horse Sanctuary's most recent accounts cover 2024. Scores and figures refresh whenever we re-ingest the register, so the page reflects our latest data pull rather than a one-off review.